Back to Search Start Over

Head-to-Head Comparison of Chest X-Ray/Head and Neck MRI, Chest CT/Head and Neck MRI, and 18F-FDG PET/CT for Detection of Distant Metastases and Synchronous Cancer in Oral, Pharyngeal, and Laryngeal Cancer

Authors :
Abass Alavi
Anders Thomassen
Poul Flemming Høilund-Carlsen
Janus Mølgaard Christiansen
Christian Godballe
Anne Lerberg Nielsen
Jørgen Johansen
Max Rohde
Jens Ahm Sørensen
Nina N. T. T. Nguyen
Anabel Diaz
Jon Thor Asmussen
Oke Gerke
Mie K. Nielsen
Source :
Rohde, M, Nielsen, A L, Johansen, J, Sørensen, J A, Nguyen, N N T T, Diaz, A, Nielsen, M K, Asmussen, J T, Christiansen, J M, Gerke, O, Thomassen, A, Alavi, A, Høilund-Carlsen, P F & Godballe, C 2017, ' Head-to-head comparison of chest x-ray/head and neck MRI, chest CT/head and neck MRI, and (18)F-FDG-PET/CT for detection of distant metastases and synchronous cancer in oral, pharyngeal, and laryngeal Cancer ', Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 58, no. 12, pp. 1919-1924 . https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.117.189704
Publication Year :
2017
Publisher :
Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2017.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the detection rate of distant metastasis and synchronous cancer, comparing clinically used imaging strategies based on chest x-ray 1 head and neck MRI (CXR/MRI) and chest CT 1 head and neck MRI (CHCT/MRI) with 18F-FDG PET/CT upfront in the diagnostic workup of patients with oral, pharyngeal, or laryngeal cancer. Methods: This was a prospective cohort study based on paired data. Consecutive patients with histologically verified primary head and squamous cell carcinoma at Odense University Hospital from September 2013 to March 2016 were considered for the study. Included patients underwent CXR/MRI and CHCT/MRI as well as PET/CT on the same day and before biopsy. Scans were read masked by separate teams of experienced nuclear physicians or radiologists. The true detection rate of distant metastasis and synchronous cancer was assessed for CXR/MRI, CHCT/MRI, and PET/CT. Results: A total of 307 patients were included. CXR/MRI correctly detected 3 (1%) patients with distant metastasis, CHCT/MRI detected 11 (4%) patients, and PET/CT detected 18 (6%) patients. The absolute differences of 5% and 2%, respectively, were statistically significant in favor of PET/CT. Also, PET/CT correctly detected 25 (8%) synchronous cancers, which was significantly more than CXR/MRI (3 patients, 1%) and CHCT/MRI (6 patients, 2%). The true detection rate of distant metastasis or synchronous cancer with PET/CT was 13% (40 patients), which was significantly higher than 2% (6 patients) for CXR/ MRI and 6% (17 patients) for CHCT/MRI. Conclusion: A clinical imaging strategy based on PET/CT demonstrated a significantly higher detection rate of distant metastasis or synchronous cancer than strategies in current clinical imaging guidelines, of which European ones primarily recommend CXR/MRI, whereas U.S. guidelines preferably point to CHCT/MRI in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Details

ISSN :
2159662X and 01615505
Volume :
58
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....a8c82a6b51cbac90009e1c2b36c8b461
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.117.189704