Back to Search Start Over

Nasal high-frequency oscillatory ventilation and CO2 removal: A randomized controlled crossover trial

Authors :
Massimo Agosti
Jurate Navikiene
Vladimiras Chijenas
Claudia Aurilia
Mariarosa Colnaghi
Roberta Pastorino
Milena Tana
Ausrine Pliauckiene
Cristina Haass
Chiara Tirone
Alessandra Lio
Gianluca Lista
D. Mercadante
Federica Pontiggia
Cinzia Ricci
Alessandro Gambacorta
Fabio Mosca
Chiara Consigli
Angela Paladini
Giovanni Vento
Roberto Bottino
Velia Purcaro
Pio Liberatore
Gianfranco Maffei
Arunas Liubsys
Source :
Pediatric Pulmonology. 53:1245-1251
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
Wiley, 2018.

Abstract

Objective To compare short-term application of nasal high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (nHFOV) with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP). Working hypothesis nHFOV improves CO2 removal with respect to nCPAP in preterm infants needing noninvasive respiratory support and persistent oxygen supply after the first 72 h of life. Study design Multicenter non-blinded prospective randomized crossover study. Patient selection Thirty premature infants from eight tertiary neonatal intensive care units, of mean ± SD 26.4 ± 1.8 weeks of gestational age and 921 ± 177 g of birth weight. Methodology Infants were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive a starting treatment mode of either nCPAP or nHFOV delivered by the ventilator CNO (Medin, Germany), using short binasal prongs of appropriate size. A crossover design with four 1-h treatment periods was used, such that each infant received both treatments twice. The primary outcome was the mean transcutaneous partial pressure of CO2 (TcCO2 ) value during the 2-h cumulative period of nHFOV compared with the 2-h cumulative period of nCPAP. Results Significantly lower TcCO2 values were observed during nHFOV compared with nCPAP: 47.5 ± 7.6 versus 49.9 ± 7.2 mmHg, respectively, P = 0.0007. A different TcCO2 behavior was found according to the random sequence: in patients starting on nCPAP, TcCO2 significantly decreased from 50.0 ± 8.0 to 46.6 ± 7.5 mmHg during nHFOV (P = 0.001). In patients starting on nHFOV, TcCO2 slightly increased from 48.5 ± 7.8 to 49.9 ± 6.7 mmHg during nCPAP (P = 0.13). Conclusions nHFOV delivered through nasal prongs is more effective than nCPAP in improving the elimination of CO2 .

Details

ISSN :
87556863
Volume :
53
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Pediatric Pulmonology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....a96b50cd580e48a69c6dbb2ca3c1f316