Back to Search
Start Over
Pregnant womens’ views about choice of intrapartum monitoring of the fetal heart rate: A questionnaire survey
- Source :
- International Journal of Nursing Studies. 45:224-231
- Publication Year :
- 2008
- Publisher :
- Elsevier BV, 2008.
-
Abstract
- Aim To investigate the degree of choice pregnant women at low obstetric risk had in making informed decisions on the use of intrapartum fetal monitoring techniques. Methods An exploratory descriptive design was used as part of a larger, multi-method study. A total of 63 pregnant women at low obstetric risk were approached to complete antepartum and postpartum questionnaires. Sixty-three women completed antepartum questionnaires, 38 of these 63 women also completed postpartum questionnaires. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results More than half of the sample wanted electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) in labor despite being classified at low risk for obstetric complications. Having choices and being in control was important to all respondents whilst in labor. Despite this, almost all respondents stated that midwives had not given them a choice of monitoring method. More than a half of the sample received some form of EFM. Conclusions Intrapartum fetal monitoring practices for women with normal pregnancies do not reflect current evidence. Women still expect EFM in labor. Choice and control are very complex issues and as such are difficult to measure.
- Subjects :
- Adult
Pregnancy
medicine.medical_specialty
Obstetric risk
Descriptive statistics
Obstetrics
business.industry
MEDLINE
Questionnaire
medicine.disease
Fetal monitoring
Fetal heart rate
Surveys and Questionnaires
Electronic fetal monitoring
medicine
Humans
Female
Medical emergency
Fetal Monitoring
business
reproductive and urinary physiology
General Nursing
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 00207489
- Volume :
- 45
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- International Journal of Nursing Studies
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....a9a0eed24ecd20a291b9c64f364f6eb8
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.08.019