Back to Search Start Over

The use of suction blisters to measure sunscreen protection against UVR- induced DNA damage

Authors :
Emmanuel Questel
Eléonore Gravier
Gwendal Josse
Thierry Douki
Jimmy Le Digabel
CERPER Institut de Recherche Pierre Fabre
Centre de Recherche Pierre Fabre (Centre de R&D Pierre Fabre)
PIERRE FABRE-PIERRE FABRE
Chimie Interface Biologie pour l’Environnement, la Santé et la Toxicologie (CIBEST )
SYstèmes Moléculaires et nanoMatériaux pour l’Energie et la Santé (SYMMES)
Institut de Chimie du CNRS (INC)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Grenoble Alpes [2016-2019] (UGA [2016-2019])-Institut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire de Grenoble (IRIG)
Direction de Recherche Fondamentale (CEA) (DRF (CEA))
Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Direction de Recherche Fondamentale (CEA) (DRF (CEA))
Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut de Chimie du CNRS (INC)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Grenoble Alpes [2016-2019] (UGA [2016-2019])-Institut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire de Grenoble (IRIG)
Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)
Laboratoire de Pharmacochimie Pierre Fabre Dermo-Cosmétique
Res Ctr
Institut Curie
Institut de Chimie du CNRS (INC)-Université Grenoble Alpes [2016-2019] (UGA [2016-2019])-Institut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire de Grenoble (IRIG)
Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut de Chimie du CNRS (INC)-Université Grenoble Alpes [2016-2019] (UGA [2016-2019])-Institut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire de Grenoble (IRIG)
Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Source :
Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, 2018, 179, pp.1-6. ⟨10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2017.12.021⟩, Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, Elsevier, 2018, 179, pp.1-6. ⟨10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2017.12.021⟩
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2018.

Abstract

The formation of DNA photoproducts caused by solar UVR exposure needs to be investigated in-vivo and in particular in order to assess sunscreens' level of protection against solar genotoxicity. The study's purposes were: i) to evaluate if the roof of suction blisters is an appropriate sampling method for measuring photoproducts, and ii) to measure in-vivo sunscreen protection against cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers. Skin areas on the interior forearms of eight healthy volunteers were exposed in-vivo to 2 MED of simulated solar radiation (SSR) and to 15 MED on a sunscreen protected area. After irradiation, six suction blisters were induced and the blister roofs were collected. Analysis of SSR-induced CPDs was performed by two independent methods: a chromatography coupled to mass spectroscopy (HPLC-MS/MS) approach and a 3D-imaging of CPD immunostaining by multiphoton microscopy on floating epidermal sheets. HPLC-MS/MS analyses showed that SSR-unexposed skin presented no CPD dimers, whereas 2 MED SSR-exposed skin showed a significant number of TT-CPD. The sunscreen covered skin exposed to 15 MED appeared highly protected from DNA damage, as the amount of CPD-dimers remained below the detection limit. The multiphoton-immunostaining analysis consistently showed that no CPD staining was observed on the non-SSR-exposed skin. A significant increase of CPD staining intensity and number of CPD-positive cells were observed on the 2 MED SSR-exposed skin. Sunscreen protected skin presented a very low staining intensity and the number of CPD-positive cells remained very close to non-SSR-exposed skin. This study showed that suction blister samples are very appropriate for measuring CPD dimers in-vivo, and that sunscreens provide high protection against UVR-induced DNA damage.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10111344
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, 2018, 179, pp.1-6. ⟨10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2017.12.021⟩, Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, Elsevier, 2018, 179, pp.1-6. ⟨10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2017.12.021⟩
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....a9c9a9d42ef898bb92c97a5096ce0e6a
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2017.12.021⟩