Back to Search
Start Over
Freshwater ecotoxicity assessment of pesticide use in crop production: Testing the influence of modeling choices
- Source :
- IRTA Pubpro. Open Digital Archive, Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentàries (IRTA), Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Peña, N, Knudsen, M T, Fantke, P, Anton, A & Hermansen, J E 2019, ' Freshwater ecotoxicity assessment of pesticide use in crop production : Testing the influence of modeling choices ', Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 209, no. February, pp. 1332-1341 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.257, Peña, N, Knudsen, M T, Fantke, P, Anton, A & Hermansen, J E 2019, ' Freshwater ecotoxicity assessment of pesticide use in crop production: Testing the influence of modeling choices ', Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 209, pp. 1332-1341 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.257
- Publication Year :
- 2019
- Publisher :
- Elsevier BV, 2019.
-
Abstract
- Unidad de excelencia María de Maeztu MdM-2015-0552 Altres ajuts: Programa CERCA - Generalitat de Catalunya Pesticides help to control weeds, pests, and diseases contributing, therefore, to food availability. However, pesticide fractions not reaching the intended target may have adverse effects on the environment and the field ecosystems. Modeling pesticide emissions and the link with characterizing associated impacts is currently one of the main challenges in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of agricultural systems. To address this challenge, this study takes advantage of the latest recommendations for pesticide emission inventory and impact assessment and frames a suitable interface for those LCA stages and the related mass distribution of pesticide avoiding a temporal overlapping. Here, freshwater ecotoxicity impacts of the production of feed crops (maize, grass, winter wheat, spring barley, rapeseed, and peas) in Denmark were evaluated during a 3-year period, testing the effects of inventory modeling and the recent updates of the characterization method (USEtox). Potential freshwater ecotoxicity impacts were calculated in two functional units reflecting crop impact profiles per ha and extent of cultivation, respectively. Ecotoxicity impacts decreased over the period, mainly because of the reduction of insecticides use (e.g., cypermethrin). Three different emission modeling scenarios were tested; they differ on the underlining assumptions and data requirements. The main aspects influencing impact results are the interface between inventory estimates and impact assessment, and the consideration of intermedia processes, such as crop growth development and pesticide application method. Impact scores for AS2 were higher than RS and AS1, but the differences in the crops ranking was less apparent. On the other hand, the influence on the estimation of impacts for individual AIs was considerable and statistical differences were found in the impact results modeled in scenarios RS and AS2. Thereby indicating the effect of inventory models on ecotoxicity impact assessment.
- Subjects :
- Inventory modeling
020209 energy
Strategy and Management
Pesticide application
02 engineering and technology
Agricultural engineering
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Feed crops
0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering
Ecosystem
SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
Emission inventory
Life-cycle assessment
SDG 15 - Life on Land
0505 law
General Environmental Science
2. Zero hunger
Pesticide emission factors
Life cycle impact assessment (LCIA)
Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
business.industry
Impact assessment
05 social sciences
food and beverages
Ecotoxicity characterization
Agriculture
15. Life on land
Pesticide
6. Clean water
13. Climate action
050501 criminology
Environmental science
Ecotoxicity
SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
business
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 09596526
- Volume :
- 209
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....a9dd26fd1f26110ad197ff76b5e76048
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.257