Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of toxic effects of atorvastatin and gemfibrozil on Daphnia magna

Authors :
Rui Ding
Xiangping Nie
Limei Hu
Source :
Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Toxicology & Pharmacology. 252:109224
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2022.

Abstract

Atorvastatin (ATV) and gemfibrozil (GEM) are two typical lipid-lowering pharmaceuticals with different action modes, which are frequently detected in various water bodies owning to their wide usage. However, there is limited information about their effects on Daphnia magna. The present study addressed and compared the toxic effects of ATV and GEM on D. magna through determining the responses of the stress related genes (including Nrf2, Keap1, HO-1, GCLC, p53 and PIG3) in D. magna for 24 h and 48 h acute exposure and the changes of life history traits and swimming behaviors in a 21 days chronic exposure under different concentrations of ATV and GEM exposure (5 μg L−1, 50 μg L−1, 500 μg L−1 and 5000 μg L−1). Results showed that the expression of Nrf2, Keap1, HO-1, GCLC, p53 and PIG3 were induced to various degrees under the ATV exposure. There were similar performances for GEM. ATV and GEM caused the delay of first brooding and hatching time and decrease of eggs production number, especially in GEM exposure, reproduction of Daphnia was significantly inhibited, decreasing 38.51% compared to the control. ATV and GEM increased the heart rate of D. magna, and changed swimming behaviors of D. magna. In summary, two lipid-lowering pharmaceuticals caused oxidative stress on D. magna, subsequently brought about alterations in physiological traits. Comparatively, ATV pose more higher risks to D. magna than GEM, but the detailed action mechanisms of ATV and GEM on D. magna needs more investigations in future.

Details

ISSN :
15320456
Volume :
252
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Toxicology & Pharmacology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....ab52ada1419b58faf8bbbfd10d3905f3
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpc.2021.109224