Back to Search Start Over

In vitro efficacy of six cephalosporins tested against Enterobacteriaceae isolated at 38 North American medical centres participating in the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 1997–1998

Authors :
Reuben Ramphal
Ronald N. Jones
Daryl J. Hoban
Michael A. Pfaller
Stephen G. Jenkins
Source :
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 15:111-118
Publication Year :
2000
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2000.

Abstract

The SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program is an ongoing international collaboration that monitors the predominant bacterial and fungal pathogens and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns associated with community-acquired and nosocomial infections. SENTRY data on the current cephalosporin susceptibility patterns (1997–98) of North American isolates of clinically important Enterobacteriaceae were analyzed. Susceptibility to a selection of cephalosporins was assessed at a central laboratory using reference broth microdilution methods and interpretive criteria specified by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. The third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins tested demonstrated excellent activity against Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae , whereas some of the older agents maintained good efficacy. Extended spectrum β-lactamases were detected in all regions of the United States and Canada (1.8–10.7%). Cefepime was the most active agent tested against pathogens with the potential for enzyme-mediated resistance due to Amp C. The third-generation agents maintained acceptable efficacy against Serratia marcescens , but were less effective against Citrobacter and Enterobacter species. The older cephalosporins were generally inadequate against these pathogens, in contrast to cefepime, which was the widest spectrum cephalosporin overall. Some significant regional variations in spectrum were detected.

Details

ISSN :
09248579
Volume :
15
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....ab9b9984ae11e118046d7339a598dc61
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0924-8579(00)00152-7