Back to Search
Start Over
Adequacy of Cytologic Samples by Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Transthoracic Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology of Peripheral Pulmonary Nodules for Morphologic Diagnosis and Molecular Evaluations: Comparison With Computed Tomography-Guided Percutaneous Transthoracic Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology
- Source :
- Archives of pathologylaboratory medicine. 144(3)
- Publication Year :
- 2019
-
Abstract
- Context.— Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of pulmonary nodules is usually guided by computed tomography (CT), whereas ultrasonography (US) is generally considered not applicable for such purposes. Objective.— To evaluate the clinical applicability and diagnostic utility of US-guided transthoracic FNAC of peripheral pulmonary nodules. Design.— Ultrasonography-guided transthoracic FNAC was obtained from 40 selected patients with peripheral, subpleural, and paravertebral pulmonary nodules. Air-dried and Diff-Quik–stained smears were used for rapid on-site evaluation; additional smears were alcohol fixed for Papanicolaou staining. Cell blocks were set up for immunocytochemical and molecular studies; in 2 cases, a flow cytometry evaluation was also performed. The series was compared to 40 CT-guided pulmonary FNAC samples from patients with pleural, peripheral, and paravertebral pulmonary nodules, to evaluate differences in terms of diagnostic rate, time of execution, safety, and cost. Results.— The US-guided FNAC samples had results that were adequate and representative in 95% of cases. No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups in terms of diagnostic rate, number of passes, and cellularity of both smears and cell blocks. The mean time needed for the execution of US-guided FNAC was 13.1 minutes, whereas the mean time for CT-guided FNAC was 23.6 minutes. Thus, US-guided FNAC was significantly more rapid than CT-guided pulmonary FNAC. Because pneumothorax occurred in 1 individual who underwent US-guided FNAC and in 9 who underwent CT-guided FNAC, we might conclude that US-guided FNAC is a significantly safer procedure. Finally, comparing the costs of both procedures, US-guided FNAC is less expensive. Conclusions.— Our experience showed an elevated clinical applicability and diagnostic utility of US-guided transthoracic FNAC for selected pulmonary nodules.
- Subjects :
- Male
medicine.medical_specialty
Percutaneous
Lung Neoplasms
Cytodiagnosis
Computed tomography
Sensitivity and Specificity
030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging
Pathology and Forensic Medicine
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Fine needle aspiration cytology
Cytology
Medicine
Humans
Prospective Studies
skin and connective tissue diseases
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration
Lung
Aged
medicine.diagnostic_test
business.industry
Reproducibility of Results
Solitary Pulmonary Nodule
General Medicine
Middle Aged
Prognosis
Ultrasound guided
Aspiration cytology
body regions
Medical Laboratory Technology
030220 oncology & carcinogenesis
Female
Radiology
Tomography
Morphologic diagnosis
business
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 15432165
- Volume :
- 144
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Archives of pathologylaboratory medicine
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....abaa2f50170ba7df2d049f6ccf6ad567