Back to Search
Start Over
The Navigation Guide Systematic Review Methodology: A Rigorous and Transparent Method for Translating Environmental Health Science into Better Health Outcomes
- Source :
- Environmental Health Perspectives, Environmental health perspectives, vol 122, iss 10, Woodruff, TJ; & Sutton, P. (2014). The navigation guide systematic review methodology: A rigorous and transparent method for translating environmental health science into better health outcomes. Environmental Health Perspectives, 122(10), 1007-1014. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1307175. UCSF: Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/30r6t8jb
- Publication Year :
- 2014
- Publisher :
- NLM-Export, 2014.
-
Abstract
- Background: Synthesizing what is known about the environmental drivers of health is instrumental to taking prevention-oriented action. Methods of research synthesis commonly used in environmental health lag behind systematic review methods developed in the clinical sciences over the past 20 years. Objectives: We sought to develop a proof of concept of the “Navigation Guide,” a systematic and transparent method of research synthesis in environmental health. Discussion: The Navigation Guide methodology builds on best practices in research synthesis in evidence-based medicine and environmental health. Key points of departure from current methods of expert-based narrative review prevalent in environmental health include a prespecified protocol, standardized and transparent documentation including expert judgment, a comprehensive search strategy, assessment of “risk of bias,” and separation of the science from values and preferences. Key points of departure from evidence-based medicine include assigning a “moderate” quality rating to human observational studies and combining diverse evidence streams. Conclusions: The Navigation Guide methodology is a systematic and rigorous approach to research synthesis that has been developed to reduce bias and maximize transparency in the evaluation of environmental health information. Although novel aspects of the method will require further development and validation, our findings demonstrated that improved methods of research synthesis under development at the National Toxicology Program and under consideration by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency are fully achievable. The institutionalization of robust methods of systematic and transparent review would provide a concrete mechanism for linking science to timely action to prevent harm. Citation: Woodruff TJ, Sutton P. 2014. The Navigation Guide systematic review methodology: a rigorous and transparent method for translating environmental health science into better health outcomes. Environ Health Perspect 122:1007–1014; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1307175
- Subjects :
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
MEDLINE
Systematic review methodology
Review Literature as Topic
010501 environmental sciences
Toxicology
Health outcomes
Medical and Health Sciences
01 natural sciences
Hazardous Substances
Decision Support Techniques
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Bias
Humans
Medicine
Interdisciplinary communication
030212 general & internal medicine
Bias (Epidemiology)
0105 earth and related environmental sciences
Extramural
business.industry
Management science
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
3. Good health
Action (philosophy)
Commentary
Interdisciplinary Communication
business
Environmental Health
Environmental Sciences
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 15529924 and 00916765
- Volume :
- 122
- Issue :
- 10
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Environmental Health Perspectives
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....ac733969bb9e4dff3b23c35575139e38
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1307175.