Back to Search Start Over

The Navigation Guide Systematic Review Methodology: A Rigorous and Transparent Method for Translating Environmental Health Science into Better Health Outcomes

Authors :
Tracey J. Woodruff
Patrice Sutton
Source :
Environmental Health Perspectives, Environmental health perspectives, vol 122, iss 10, Woodruff, TJ; & Sutton, P. (2014). The navigation guide systematic review methodology: A rigorous and transparent method for translating environmental health science into better health outcomes. Environmental Health Perspectives, 122(10), 1007-1014. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1307175. UCSF: Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/30r6t8jb
Publication Year :
2014
Publisher :
NLM-Export, 2014.

Abstract

Background: Synthesizing what is known about the environmental drivers of health is instrumental to taking prevention-oriented action. Methods of research synthesis commonly used in environmental health lag behind systematic review methods developed in the clinical sciences over the past 20 years. Objectives: We sought to develop a proof of concept of the “Navigation Guide,” a systematic and transparent method of research synthesis in environmental health. Discussion: The Navigation Guide methodology builds on best practices in research synthesis in evidence-based medicine and environmental health. Key points of departure from current methods of expert-based narrative review prevalent in environmental health include a prespecified protocol, standardized and transparent documentation including expert judgment, a comprehensive search strategy, assessment of “risk of bias,” and separation of the science from values and preferences. Key points of departure from evidence-based medicine include assigning a “moderate” quality rating to human observational studies and combining diverse evidence streams. Conclusions: The Navigation Guide methodology is a systematic and rigorous approach to research synthesis that has been developed to reduce bias and maximize transparency in the evaluation of environmental health information. Although novel aspects of the method will require further development and validation, our findings demonstrated that improved methods of research synthesis under development at the National Toxicology Program and under consideration by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency are fully achievable. The institutionalization of robust methods of systematic and transparent review would provide a concrete mechanism for linking science to timely action to prevent harm. Citation: Woodruff TJ, Sutton P. 2014. The Navigation Guide systematic review methodology: a rigorous and transparent method for translating environmental health science into better health outcomes. Environ Health Perspect 122:1007–1014; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1307175

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15529924 and 00916765
Volume :
122
Issue :
10
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Environmental Health Perspectives
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....ac733969bb9e4dff3b23c35575139e38
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1307175.