Back to Search Start Over

Interdisciplinary approach in emergency revascularization and treatment for acute mesenteric ischemia

Authors :
Nicolas Attigah
Markus Weber
Hans Bruijnen
Anja-Rebeka Domenghino
Annelies Schnider
Igor Schwegler
Stefan Gutknecht
Alicja Zientara
Source :
BMC Surgery, BMC Surgery, Vol 21, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2021)
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Research Square Platform LLC, 2020.

Abstract

Background Mesenteric ischemia is associated with poor outcome and high overall mortality. The aim was to analyze an interdisciplinary treatment approach of vascular and visceral specialists focusing on the in-hospital outcome and follow-up in patients with acute and acute-on-chronic mesenteric ischemia. Methods From 2010 until 2017, 26 consecutive patients with acute or acute on chronic mesenteric ischemia were treated by an interdisciplinary team. Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively evaluated. Throughout the initial examination, the extent of bowel resection was determined by the visceral surgeon and the appropriate mode of revascularization by the vascular surgeon. The routine follow-up included clinical examination and ultrasound- or CT-imaging for patency assessment and overall survival as primary endpoint of the study. Results Out of 26 patients, 18 (69.2%) were rendered for open repair. Ten patients (38.5%) received reconstruction of the superior mesenteric artery with an iliac-mesenteric bypass. Seven patients (26.9%) underwent thrombembolectomy of the mesenteric artery. One patient received an infra-diaphragmatic aorto-celiac-mesenteric bypass. Out of the 8 patients, who were not suitable for open revascularization, 2 patients (7.7%) were treated endovascularly and 6 (23.1%) underwent explorative laparotomy. The in-hospital mortality was 23% (n = 6). The mean survival of the revascularized group (n = 20) was 51.8 months (95% CI 39.1–64.5) compared to 15.7 months in the non-revascularized group (n = 6) (95% CI − 4.8–36.1; p = 0.08). The median follow-up was 64.6 months. Primary patency in the 16 patients after open and 2 after interventional revascularization was 100% and 89.9% in the follow-up. Conclusion The interdisciplinary treatment of mesenteric ischemia improves survival if carried out in time. Hereby open revascularization measures are advantageous as they allow bowel assessment, resection, and revascularization in a one-stop fashion especially in advanced cases.

Details

Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
BMC Surgery, BMC Surgery, Vol 21, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2021)
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....acfa7c8d47d25b4736f23058d13b2c25
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-118711/v1