Back to Search
Start Over
Prediction models for dementia and neuropathology in the oldest old: the Vantaa 85+ cohort study
- Source :
- Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, Alzheimer’s Research & Therapy, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2019), Hall, A, Pekkala, T, Polvikoski, T, van Gils, M, Kivipelto, M, Lötjönen, J, Mattila, J, Kero, M, Myllykangas, L, Mäkelä, M, Oinas, M, Paetau, A, Soininen, H, Tanskanen, M & Solomon, A 2019, ' Prediction models for dementia and neuropathology in the oldest old : The Vantaa 85+ cohort study ', Alzheimer's Research and Therapy, vol. 11, 11 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-018-0450-3
- Publication Year :
- 2019
- Publisher :
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2019.
-
Abstract
- Background We developed multifactorial models for predicting incident dementia and brain pathology in the oldest old using the Vantaa 85+ cohort. Methods We included participants without dementia at baseline and at least 2 years of follow-up (N = 245) for dementia prediction or with autopsy data (N = 163) for pathology. A supervised machine learning method was used for model development, considering sociodemographic, cognitive, clinical, vascular, and lifestyle factors, as well as APOE genotype. Neuropathological assessments included β-amyloid, neurofibrillary tangles and neuritic plaques, cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), macro- and microscopic infarcts, α-synuclein pathology, hippocampal sclerosis, and TDP-43. Results Prediction model performance was evaluated using AUC for 10 × 10-fold cross-validation. Overall AUCs were 0.73 for dementia, 0.64–0.68 for Alzheimer’s disease (AD)- or amyloid-related pathologies, 0.72 for macroinfarcts, and 0.61 for microinfarcts. Predictors for dementia were different from those in previous reports of younger populations; for example, age, sex, and vascular and lifestyle factors were not predictive. Predictors for dementia versus pathology were also different, because cognition and education predicted dementia but not AD- or amyloid-related pathologies. APOE genotype was most consistently present across all models. APOE alleles had a different impact: ε4 did not predict dementia, but it did predict all AD- or amyloid-related pathologies; ε2 predicted dementia, but it was protective against amyloid and neuropathological AD; and ε3ε3 was protective against dementia, neurofibrillary tangles, and CAA. Very few other factors were predictive of pathology. Conclusions Differences between predictors for dementia in younger old versus oldest old populations, as well as for dementia versus pathology, should be considered more carefully in future studies. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13195-018-0450-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
- Subjects :
- Male
0301 basic medicine
Neurology
Apolipoprotein E4
CEREBROVASCULAR-DISEASE
lcsh:RC346-429
3124 Neurology and psychiatry
Cohort Studies
0302 clinical medicine
Senile plaques
Supervised machine learning
Finland
Neuropathology
POPULATION
Aged, 80 and over
education.field_of_study
APOE GENOTYPE
Brain
ASSOCIATION
Mental Status and Dementia Tests
STATE
PREVALENCE
3. Good health
Causality
ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE
Female
Cerebral amyloid angiopathy
medicine.medical_specialty
Cognitive Neuroscience
Population
APOLIPOPROTEIN-E
lcsh:RC321-571
Oldest old
03 medical and health sciences
Predictive Value of Tests
Internal medicine
mental disorders
medicine
Humans
Dementia
VASCULAR DEMENTIA
Vascular dementia
education
lcsh:Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
lcsh:Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system
Hippocampal sclerosis
business.industry
Research
3112 Neurosciences
COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT
medicine.disease
030104 developmental biology
Neurology (clinical)
Prediction
business
030217 neurology & neurosurgery
Follow-Up Studies
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 17589193
- Volume :
- 11
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....ad12e112ab89d99692d4b435e88836e5