Back to Search Start Over

Prediction models for dementia and neuropathology in the oldest old: the Vantaa 85+ cohort study

Authors :
Tuomo Polvikoski
Jussi Mattila
Anette Hall
Hilkka Soininen
Mira Mäkelä
Maarit Tanskanen
Mia Kero
Minna Oinas
Miia Kivipelto
Jyrki Lötjönen
Anders Paetau
Mark van Gils
Liisa Myllykangas
Timo Pekkala
Alina Solomon
HUSLAB
Department of Pathology
Medicum
University of Helsinki
Clinicum
Neurokirurgian yksikkö
Source :
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, Alzheimer’s Research & Therapy, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2019), Hall, A, Pekkala, T, Polvikoski, T, van Gils, M, Kivipelto, M, Lötjönen, J, Mattila, J, Kero, M, Myllykangas, L, Mäkelä, M, Oinas, M, Paetau, A, Soininen, H, Tanskanen, M & Solomon, A 2019, ' Prediction models for dementia and neuropathology in the oldest old : The Vantaa 85+ cohort study ', Alzheimer's Research and Therapy, vol. 11, 11 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-018-0450-3
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2019.

Abstract

Background We developed multifactorial models for predicting incident dementia and brain pathology in the oldest old using the Vantaa 85+ cohort. Methods We included participants without dementia at baseline and at least 2 years of follow-up (N = 245) for dementia prediction or with autopsy data (N = 163) for pathology. A supervised machine learning method was used for model development, considering sociodemographic, cognitive, clinical, vascular, and lifestyle factors, as well as APOE genotype. Neuropathological assessments included β-amyloid, neurofibrillary tangles and neuritic plaques, cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), macro- and microscopic infarcts, α-synuclein pathology, hippocampal sclerosis, and TDP-43. Results Prediction model performance was evaluated using AUC for 10 × 10-fold cross-validation. Overall AUCs were 0.73 for dementia, 0.64–0.68 for Alzheimer’s disease (AD)- or amyloid-related pathologies, 0.72 for macroinfarcts, and 0.61 for microinfarcts. Predictors for dementia were different from those in previous reports of younger populations; for example, age, sex, and vascular and lifestyle factors were not predictive. Predictors for dementia versus pathology were also different, because cognition and education predicted dementia but not AD- or amyloid-related pathologies. APOE genotype was most consistently present across all models. APOE alleles had a different impact: ε4 did not predict dementia, but it did predict all AD- or amyloid-related pathologies; ε2 predicted dementia, but it was protective against amyloid and neuropathological AD; and ε3ε3 was protective against dementia, neurofibrillary tangles, and CAA. Very few other factors were predictive of pathology. Conclusions Differences between predictors for dementia in younger old versus oldest old populations, as well as for dementia versus pathology, should be considered more carefully in future studies. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13195-018-0450-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Details

ISSN :
17589193
Volume :
11
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....ad12e112ab89d99692d4b435e88836e5