Back to Search Start Over

Perceptions and practices surrounding the perioperative management of frail emergency surgery patients: a WSES-endorsed cross-sectional qualitative survey

Authors :
Mallaika Viswanath
Darja Clinch
Marco Ceresoli
Jugdeep Dhesi
Mario D’Oria
Belinda De Simone
Mauro Podda
Salomone Di Saverio
Federico Coccolini
Massimo Sartelli
Fausto Catena
Ernest Moore
Deepa Rangar
Walter L. Biffl
Dimitrios Damaskos
Viswanath, M
Clinch, D
Ceresoli, M
Dhesi, J
D'Oria, M
De Simone, B
Podda, M
Di Saverio, S
Coccolini, F
Sartelli, M
Catena, F
Moore, E
Rangar, D
Biffl, W
Damaskos, D
Source :
World Journal of Emergency Surgery. 18
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2023.

Abstract

Background Frailty is associated with poor post-operative outcomes in emergency surgical patients. Shared multidisciplinary models have been developed to provide a holistic, reactive model of care to improve outcomes for older people living with frailty. We aimed to describe current perioperative practices, and surgeons’ awareness and perception of perioperative frailty management, and barriers to its implementation. Methods A qualitative cross-sectional survey was sent via the World Society of Emergency Surgery e-letter to their members. Responses were analysed using descriptive statistics and reported by themes: risk scoring systems, frailty awareness and assessment and barriers to implementation. Result Of 168/1000 respondents, 38% were aware of the terms “Perioperative medicine for older people undergoing surgery” (POPS) and Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA). 66.6% of respondents assessed perioperative risk, with 45.2% using the American Society of Anaesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System (ASA-PS). 77.8% of respondents mostly agreed or agreed with the statement that they routinely conducted medical comorbidity management, and pain and falls risk assessment during emergency surgical admissions. Although 98.2% of respondents agreed that frailty was important, only 2.4% performed CGA and 1.2% used a specific frailty screening tool. Clinical frailty score was the most commonly used tool by those who did. Screening was usually conducted by surgical trainees. Key barriers included a lack of knowledge about frailty assessment, a lack of clarity on who should be responsible for frailty screening, and a lack of trained staff. Conclusions Our study highlights the ubiquitous lack of awareness regarding frailty assessment and the POPS model of care. More training and clear guidelines on frailty scoring, alongside support by multidisciplinary teams, may reduce the burden on surgical trainees, potentially improving rates of appropriate frailty assessment and management of the frailty syndrome in emergency surgical patients.

Details

ISSN :
17497922
Volume :
18
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
World Journal of Emergency Surgery
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....ad7770902ef6226dda0058a1c7dea89a
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-022-00471-7