Back to Search Start Over

Impact of Intrathecal Triple Therapy Versus Intrathecal Methotrexate on Disease-Free Survival for High-Risk B-Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Children's Oncology Group Study AALL1131

Authors :
Kristina K. Hardy
Nyla A. Heerema
Michael J. Burke
Patrick A. Zweidler-McKay
Karen R. Rabin
Eric Larsen
Yunfeng Dai
Michael J. Borowitz
Meenakshi Devidas
William L. Carroll
Joanne M. Hilden
Elizabeth A. Raetz
Brent L. Wood
Lia Gore
Andrew J. Carroll
Mignon L. Loh
Wanda L. Salzer
Naomi J. Winick
Stephen P. Hunger
John A. Kairalla
Source :
J Clin Oncol
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

PURPOSE The high-risk stratum of Children’s Oncology Group Study AALL1131 was designed to test the hypothesis that postinduction CNS prophylaxis with intrathecal triple therapy (ITT) including methotrexate, hydrocortisone, and cytarabine would improve the postinduction 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) compared with intrathecal methotrexate (IT MTX), when given on a modified augmented Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster backbone. PATIENTS AND METHODS Children with newly diagnosed National Cancer Institute (NCI) high-risk B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (HR B-ALL) or NCI standard-risk B-ALL with defined minimal residual disease thresholds during induction were randomly assigned to receive postinduction IT MTX or ITT. Patients with CNS3-status disease were not eligible. Postinduction IT therapy was given for a total of 21 to 26 doses. Neurocognitive assessments were performed during therapy and during 1 year off therapy. RESULTS Random assignment was closed to accrual in March 2018 after a futility boundary had been crossed, concluding that ITT could not be shown to be superior to IT MTX. The 5-year postinduction DFS and overall survival rates (± SE) of children randomly assigned to IT MTX versus ITT were 93.2% ± 2.1% v 90.6% ± 2.3% ( P = .85), and 96.3% ± 1.5% v 96.7% ± 1.4% ( P = .77), respectively. There were no differences in the cumulative incidence of isolated bone marrow relapse, isolated CNS relapse, or combined bone marrow and CNS relapse rates, or in toxicities observed for patients receiving IT MTX compared with ITT. There were no significant differences in neurocognitive outcomes for patients receiving IT MTX compared with ITT. CONCLUSION Postinduction CNS prophylaxis with ITT did not improve 5-year DFS for children with HR B-ALL. The standard of care for CNS prophylaxis for children with B-ALL and no overt CNS involvement remains IT MTX.

Details

ISSN :
15277755
Volume :
38
Issue :
23
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....adb1762d556bb0ef381de0977efa85b4