A randomized trial provided new evidence on the accuracy and efficiency of traditional vs. electronically annotated abstraction approaches in systematic reviews

MLA

Berry de Bruijn, et al. “A Randomized Trial Provided New Evidence on the Accuracy and Efficiency of Traditional vs. Electronically Annotated Abstraction Approaches in Systematic Reviews.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 115, Mar. 2019. EBSCOhost, widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=edsair&AN=edsair.doi.dedup.....adb9d911577f49b827025abecbca53c7&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.

APA

Berry de Bruijn, Joseph K. Canner, Simona Carini, Christopher H. Schmid, Tianjing Li, Kay Dickersin, Wiley Chan, Jesse A. Berlin, Ian J. Saldanha, Bryant T Smith, Elizabeth J. Whamond, Vernal Branch, Byron C. Wallace, Susan Hutfless, Joseph Lau, Ida Sim, Sandra A. Walsh, M. Hassan Murad, & Jens Jap. (2019). A randomized trial provided new evidence on the accuracy and efficiency of traditional vs. electronically annotated abstraction approaches in systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 115.

Chicago

Berry de Bruijn, Joseph K. Canner, Simona Carini, Christopher H. Schmid, Tianjing Li, Kay Dickersin, Wiley Chan, et al. 2019. “A Randomized Trial Provided New Evidence on the Accuracy and Efficiency of Traditional vs. Electronically Annotated Abstraction Approaches in Systematic Reviews.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 115 (March). http://widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=edsair&AN=edsair.doi.dedup.....adb9d911577f49b827025abecbca53c7&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.