Back to Search
Start Over
An evaluation tool for Myofascial Adhesions in Patients after Breast Cancer (MAP-BC evaluation tool): Concurrent, face and content validity
- Source :
- PLoS ONE, PLOS ONE, 13(3):0193915. Public Library of Science, PLoS ONE, Vol 13, Iss 3, p e0193915 (2018)
- Publication Year :
- 2017
-
Abstract
- Purpose To investigate the concurrent, face and content validity of an evaluation tool for Myofascial Adhesions in Patients after Breast Cancer (MAP-BC evaluation tool). Methods 1) Concurrent validity of the MAP-BC evaluation tool was investigated by exploring correlations (Spearman’s rank Correlation Coefficient) between the subjective scores (0 –no adhesions to 3 –very strong adhesions) of the skin level using the MAP-BC evaluation tool and objective elasticity parameters (maximal skin extension and gross elasticity) generated by the Cutometer Dual MPA 580. Nine different examination points on and around the mastectomy scar were evaluated. 2) Face and content validity were explored by questioning therapists experienced with myofascial therapy in breast cancer patients about the comprehensibility and comprehensiveness of the MAP-BC evaluation tool. Results 1) Only three meaningful correlations were found on the mastectomy scar. For the most lateral examination point on the mastectomy scar a moderate negative correlation (-0.44, p = 0.01) with the maximal skin extension and a moderate positive correlation with the resistance versus ability of returning or ‘gross elasticity’ (0.42, p = 0.02) were found. For the middle point on the mastectomy scar an almost moderate positive correlation with gross elasticity was found as well (0.38, p = 0.04) 2) Content and face validity have been found to be good. Eighty-nine percent of the respondent found the instructions understandable and 98% found the scoring system obvious. Thirty-seven percent of the therapists suggested to add the possibility to evaluate additional anatomical locations in case of reconstructive and/or bilateral surgery. Conclusions The MAP-BC evaluation tool for myofascial adhesions in breast cancer patients has good face and content validity. Evidence for good concurrent validity of the skin level was found only on the mastectomy scar itself.
- Subjects :
- Breast Neoplasms/pathology
Critical Care and Emergency Medicine
SURGERY
medicine.medical_treatment
Cancer Treatment
lcsh:Medicine
Scars
Tissue Adhesions
METER
Severity of Illness Index
0302 clinical medicine
Breast Tumors
Content validity
Medicine and Health Sciences
Medicine
Breast
lcsh:Science
Myofascial Pain Syndromes
Mastectomy
Trauma Medicine
Pain, Postoperative
Multidisciplinary
QUANTITATIVE MEASUREMENT
Middle Aged
Oncology
Organ Specificity
RELIABILITY
Female
Radiology
medicine.symptom
Burns
Traumatic Injury
Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Techniques
Research Article
Adult
medicine.medical_specialty
Concurrent validity
Pain
Breast Neoplasms
Surgical and Invasive Medical Procedures
Dermatology
HYPERTROPHIC SCAR
03 medical and health sciences
Cicatrix
Breast cancer
Severity of illness
Breast Cancer
Humans
SKIN ELASTICITY
Postoperative/diagnosis
Myofascial Pain Syndromes/diagnosis
Thoracic Wall
Face validity
Rank correlation
Tissue Adhesions/complications
Surgical Excision
business.industry
lcsh:R
Cancers and Neoplasms
030208 emergency & critical care medicine
medicine.disease
Cicatrix/complications
Elasticity
Skin Grafting
Pain, Postoperative/diagnosis
Axilla
lcsh:Q
business
030217 neurology & neurosurgery
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 19326203
- Volume :
- 13
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- PloS one
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....ae39a92329e0492e5ec8920cf28929cd