Back to Search
Start Over
Identifying the PECO:A framework for formulating good questions to explore the association of environmental and other exposures with health outcomes
- Publication Year :
- 2018
-
Abstract
- [First paragraph] A clearly-framed question creates the structure and delineates the approach to defining research objectives, conducting systematic reviews and developing health guidance (Guyatt et al., 2011; Armstrong et al., 2007). To assess the association between exposures and outcomes, including in the field of nutrition, environmental and occupational health, the concept of defining the Population (including animal species), Exposure, Comparator, and Outcomes (PECO) as pillars of the question is increasingly accepted (Morgan et al., 2016; Morgan et al., n.d.). Thus, the PECO defines the objectives of the review or guideline. Furthermore, the PECO informs the study design or inclusion and exclusion criteria for a review, as well as facilitating the interpretation of the directness of the findings based on how well the actual research findings represent the original question.
- Subjects :
- education.field_of_study
Association (object-oriented programming)
Applied psychology
Population
MEDLINE
Guideline
010501 environmental sciences
01 natural sciences
Peco
Occupational safety and health
Article
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Systematic review
030212 general & internal medicine
Paragraph
Psychology
education
0105 earth and related environmental sciences
General Environmental Science
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....aef261124dba600a6e58c85054a38712
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.07.015