Back to Search Start Over

Recommendations to improve identification of hereditary and familial colorectal cancer in Europe

Authors :
Lucio Bertario
Yann Parc
Müller H
Christoph Engel
Astrid Stormorken
Angel Alonso
Peter Möller
Karl Heinimann
Hans F. A. Vasen
Frederik J. Hes
Fokko M. Nagengast
John A. Karagiannis
John Burn
M. Ponz de Leon
Stefan Aretz
Nils Rahner
Torben Myrhøj
Ignacio Blanco
Sabine Tejpar
Heikki Järvinen
E. Claes
Huw Thomas
Chrystelle Colas
Isis Dove-Edwin
Ian M. Frayling
Laura Renkonen-Sinisalo
Jan Lubinski
Jukka-Pekka Mecklin
Steffen Bülow
Inge Bernstein
Shirley Hodgson
Juul T. Wijnen
Annika Lindblom
Gabriel Capellá
G Moslein
Julian R. Sampson
Clinical sciences
Medical Genetics
Faculty of Economic and Social Sciences and Solvay Business School
Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences
Centre Leo Apostel
Language and literature
Centre of Expertise on Gender, Diversity and Intersectionality
Centre for Literary and Intermedial Crossings
Research Centre : Esthetics, Imaginary and Creation
Source :
Familial Cancer, 9(2), 109-115, Familial Cancer, 9, 2, pp. 109-15, Familial Cancer, 9, 109-15, Familial Cancer
Publication Year :
2010

Abstract

Item does not contain fulltext Familial colorectal cancer (CRC) accounts for 10-15% of all CRCs. In about 5% of all cases, CRC is associated with a highly penetrant dominant inherited syndrome. The most common inherited form of non-polyposis CRC is the Lynch syndrome which is responsible for about 2-4% of all cases. Surveillance of individuals at high risk for CRC prevents the development of advanced CRC. About 1 million individuals in Western Europe are at risk for Lynch syndrome. We performed a survey to evaluate the strategies currently used to identify individuals at high risk for CRC in 14 Western European countries. Questionnaires were distributed amongst members of a European collaborative group of experts that aims to improve the prognosis of families with hereditary CRC. The survey showed that in all countries obtaining a family history followed by referral to clinical genetics centres of suspected cases was the main strategy to identify familial and hereditary CRC. In five out of seven countries with a (regional or national) CRC population screening program, attention was paid in the program to the detection of familial CRC. In only one country were special campaigns organized to increase the awareness of familial CRC among the general population. In almost all countries, the family history is assessed when a patient visits a general practitioner or hospital. However, the quality of family history taking was felt to be rather poor. Microsatellite instability testing (MSI) or immunohistochemical analysis (IHC) of CRC are usually recommended as tools to select high-risk patients for genetic testing and are performed in most countries in patients suspected of Lynch syndrome. In one country, IHC was recommended in all new cases of CRC. In most countries there are no specific programs on cancer genetics in the teaching curriculum for medical doctors. In conclusion, the outcome of this survey and the discussions within an European expert group may be used to improve the strategies to identify individuals at high risk of CRC. More attention should be given to increasing the awareness of the general population of hereditary CRC. Immunohistochemical analysis or MSI-analysis of all CRCs may be an effective tool for identifying all Lynch syndrome families. The cost-effectiveness of this approach should be further evaluated. All countries with a CRC population screening program should obtain a full family history as part of patient assessment. 01 juni 2010

Details

ISSN :
13899600
Volume :
9
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Familial Cancer
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....af305ca4e2a2a135f6987991089c0ea9