Back to Search
Start Over
Comparison of transepithelial resistance measurement techniques: Chopsticks vs. Endohm
- Source :
- Biological Procedures
- Publication Year :
- 2017
- Publisher :
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2017.
-
Abstract
- Background TER measurements across confluent cellular monolayers provide a useful indication of TJ strength between epithelial and endothelial cells in culture. Having a reliable and accurate method of measuring cell-to-cell adhesion is critical to studies in pathophysiology and cancer metastasis. However, the use of different technical approaches to measure TER has reportedly yielded inconsistent measurements within the same cell lines. Methods In the current study, we compared the peak TER values for the MDCK (canine kidney) and MCF-7 (human breast cancer) epithelial cell lines using two common approaches (Chopstick and Endohm) and two types of polymer inserts (PC and PET). Results Both cell lines demonstrated a statistically significant difference in the peak TERs obtained using the two different approaches. Further, the MDCK (but not the MCF-7) cells demonstrated a statistically significant difference between the peak TERs when using the same approach but different inserts. Conclusion Our study indicates the importance of using a single approach when seeking to measure and compare the TER values of cultured cell lines.
- Subjects :
- 0301 basic medicine
MDA-MB-157
Cancer metastasis
General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
PC inserts
medicine
Cultured cell
Tight junctions
Tight junction
Chemistry
Methodology
food and beverages
Cancer
Adhesion
PET inserts
medicine.disease
Molecular biology
Epithelium
030104 developmental biology
medicine.anatomical_structure
MCF-7
Cell culture
030220 oncology & carcinogenesis
Claudins
human activities
MDCK
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 14809222
- Volume :
- 19
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Biological Procedures Online
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....af678a0101fb8e00280ef174564d5bd3
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12575-017-0053-6