Back to Search Start Over

Differential antiviral effects of pegylated interferon-α2a and pegylated interferon-α2b in chronic hepatitis C

Differential antiviral effects of pegylated interferon-α2a and pegylated interferon-α2b in chronic hepatitis C

Authors :
Antonio Parrella
Riccardo Utili
Roberto Andini
Emanuele Durante-Mangoni
Carminia Battimelli
Rosa Molaro
Domenico Iossa
Giuseppe Sodano
Source :
Clinical drug investigation. 34(12)
Publication Year :
2014

Abstract

Pegylated interferon (peg-IFN)-α2a and -α2b show different pharmacokinetic properties but are used interchangeably for hepatitis C treatment in traditional dual combinations and with newer agents. We assessed whether peg-IFN antiviral effects vary with peg-IFN subtype, affecting viral response in a differential manner.Chronic hepatitis C patients treated with ribavirin combined with peg-IFN-α2a (N = 109) or -α2b (N = 114) were studied. Hepatitis C virus RNA quantitation was performed by Cobas TaqMan 5 min before treatment start and subsequently after 48/72 h and 7, 14, 28 and 90 days. Antiviral effect was assessed in terms of viraemia changes over treatment. Histology grading and staging, interleukin-28B (IL28B) status and baseline viral genotype, alanine aminotransferase, gamma glutamyltransferase and glucose were analysed.Viraemia decline after 48/72 h and 7 days was significantly greater with peg-IFN-α2b (1.96 and 2.12 vs 1.49 and 1.20 log10 IU/mL with peg-IFN-α2a; p0.001). Differences were of larger extent in patients with advanced fibrosis (p = 0.002), genotype 1 infection (p = 0.002) and CT/TT genotypes of IL28B (p = 0.001). A rebound in viral load was observed significantly more often after the first dose in patients treated with peg-IFN-α2b (78 vs 28 % in those with peg-IFN-α2a; p = 0.0001). Differences between peg-IFNs disappeared by day 28 of treatment.There are significant pharmacodynamic differences between peg-IFN-α2a and -α2b in the early phase of chronic hepatitis C treatment. The greater early viral decline observed with peg-IFN-α2b was essentially confined to 'difficult to treat' patients. Whether this could affect response-guided treatment decision making, as well as triple drug regimens, needs to be assessed.

Details

ISSN :
11791918
Volume :
34
Issue :
12
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Clinical drug investigation
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....afc41b50e4ee7973665c745f714c8de0