Back to Search Start Over

Clinical Rejection Is Distinguished from Subclinical Rejection by Increased Infiltration by a Population of Activated Macrophages

Authors :
John Jeffery
Paul C. Grimm
Rachel M. McKenna
Elzbieta Gospodarek
David N. Rush
Mary E. Russell
Peter Nickerson
Bin Liu
J Gough
Source :
Scopus-Elsevier
Publication Year :
1999
Publisher :
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 1999.

Abstract

It has been reported previously that one-third of protocol renal biopsies in asymptomatic, biochemically stable renal transplant recipients in the first 6 mo show unsuspected subclinical graft rejection (both infiltrate and tubulitis) and that subclinical rejection is a risk factor for chronic renal dysfunction. This study was performed to determine whether differences in phenotype or activation status of graft-infiltrating cells underlie these different manifestations of acute rejection. Biopsies with normal histology (n = 10), subclinical rejection (n = 13), and clinical rejection (n = 9) were studied using immunohistochemistry and computerized image analysis. Subclinical and clinical rejections had similar histologic Banff scores. Univariate analysis showed a trend for a higher infiltration with CD8+ (P = 0.053) and CD68+(P = 0.06) cells in clinical rejection. Of the activation markers studied (CD25, perforin, tumor necrosis factor-alpha), only allograft inflammatory factor-1+-activated macrophages were significantly (P = 0.014) increased in the infiltrate of clinical rejection biopsies. These data suggest that activated macrophages or their products are responsible for acute renal dysfunction associated with clinical rejection episodes.

Details

ISSN :
10466673
Volume :
10
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....b1737d3872d1f59741ece7991739994c
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.v1071582