Back to Search Start Over

Patent Foramen Ovale Closure and Decompression Sickness Among Divers

Authors :
Samir R. Kapadia
Ahmed Sayed
Yehia Saleh
George S. Abela
Hani Jneid
Malak Munir
Omar M Abdelfattah
Islam Y. Elgendy
Source :
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine. 40:160-162
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2022.

Abstract

Background Decompression sickness is a diving-related disease that results in various clinical manifestations, ranging from joint pain to severe pulmonary and CNS affection. Complications of this disease may sometimes persist even after treatment with hyperbaric oxygen therapy . In addition, it may hamper the quality of life by forcing divers to restrict their recreational practice. The presence of a patent foramen ovale (PFO) increases the risk of decompression sickness by facilitating air embolization . Therefore, PFO closure may play a role in reducing such complications. However, PFO closure remains associated with its own set of risks and complications. We sought to assess the benefit and harm of PFO closure for the prevention of decompression sickness in divers. Methods We conducted a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase , CENTRAL, and Web of Science . Two-armed studies comparing the incidence of decompression sickness with or without PFO closure were included. We used a random-effects model to compute risk ratios comparing groups undergoing PFO closure to those not undergoing PFO closure. Results Four observational studies with a total of 309 divers (PFO closure: 141 and no closure: 168) met inclusion criteria. PFO closure was associated with a significantly lower incidence of decompression sickness (PFO-closure: 2.84%; no closure: 11.3%; RR: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.89; NNTB = 11), with low heterogeneity (I2 = 0%). The mean follow-up was 6.12 years (Standard deviation 0.70). Adverse events occurred in 7.63% of PFO closures, including tachyarrhythmias and bleeding. Conclusion PFO closure may potentially reduce the risk of decompression sickness among divers; however, it is not free of potential downsides, with nearly one in thirteen patients in our analysis experiencing an adverse event.

Details

ISSN :
15538389
Volume :
40
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....b1984f5d40c7b353bb57ef25cc22dd79