Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of Pulmicort®pMDI plus Nebuhaler®and Pulmicort®Turbuhaler®in asthmatic patients with dysphonia

Authors :
Maria H Dewar
A.C.W.S. Ning
S P Matusiewicz
R. Sanderson
Graham K. Crompton
Andrew P. Greening
A. Mclean
A.H. Jamieson
Source :
Respiratory Medicine. 94(5):448-453
Publication Year :
2000
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2000.

Abstract

Background. Dysphonia is a known local adverse eAect of inhaled corticosteroids. This symptom was investigated by laryngoscopy and assessment in a voice laboratory. The eAects of changing the treatment of patients with dysphonia, reported whilst using the pMDI, to pMDI plus Nebuhaler 1 or Tubuhaler 1 was also assessed. Methods. Seventy-two patients reporting dysphonia and taking inhaled steroids from a pMDI entered a 12-week, open, parallel group study. Fifty-one completed the study per protocol; 26 in the Nebuhaler group [21 female, mean age 57 years (22‐77)] and 25 in the Turbuhaler 1 group [18 female, mean age 58 years (21‐81)]. A dysphonia diary card was completed weekly. Voice laboratory assessments and laryngoscopy were performed on entry and at 12 weeks. Results. There were no diAerences in voice laboratory data, laryngoscopic evidence of disordered glottic closure and diary data between the two groups at 12 weeks. At study entry laryngoscopic appearances were normal in almost half the patients. Vocal cord bowing was rarely seen. Glottic closure changed in nine patients during the study period, but there was no correlation with voice symptoms. The trend of symptomatic improvement of voice status in the Turbuhaler 1 group did not correlate with voice laboratory assessments and laryngoscopic evidence of disordered glottic closure. After 4 weeks, 40% of patients using Turbuhaler 1 and 8% in the Nebuhaler 1 group scored their voice status as better (P

Details

ISSN :
09546111
Volume :
94
Issue :
5
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Respiratory Medicine
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....b1b931e8b4ac9d130377e5dfe7c220d9
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1053/rmed.1999.0762