Back to Search Start Over

Use of healthcare claims to validate the Prevention of Arrhythmia Device Infection Trial cardiac implantable electronic device infection risk score

Authors :
Charles J. Love
Arnold J. Greenspon
François Philippon
Christopher Cooper
Heather L. Bloom
Fozia Z Ahmed
Khaldoun G. Tarakji
Jens Brock Johansen
Carina Blomström-Lundqvist
Daniel R. Lexcen
Andrew D. Krahn
Ying Xia
Christopher Ellis
Andreas Goette
Lou Sherfesee
Reece Holbrook
Swathi Seshadri
Source :
Ahmed, F Z, Blomström-Lundqvist, C, Bloom, H, Cooper, C, Ellis, C, Goette, A, Greenspon, A J, Love, C J, Johansen, J B, Philippon, F, Tarakji, K G, Holbrook, R, Sherfesee, L, Xia, Y, Seshadri, S, Lexcen, D R & Krahn, A D 2021, ' Use of healthcare claims to validate the Prevention of Arrhythmia Device Infection Trial cardiac implantable electronic device infection risk score ', Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 1446-1455 . https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euab028, Europace
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Oxford University Press (OUP), 2021.

Abstract

Aim The Prevention of Arrhythmia Device Infection Trial (PADIT) infection risk score, developed based on a large prospectively collected data set, identified five independent predictors of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection. We performed an independent validation of the risk score in a data set extracted from U.S. healthcare claims. Methods and results Retrospective identification of index CIED procedures among patients aged ≥18 years with at least one record of a CIED procedure between January 2011 and September 2014 in a U.S health claims database. PADIT risk factors and major CIED infections (with system removal, invasive procedure without system removal, or infection-attributable death) were identified through diagnosis and procedure codes. The data set was randomized by PADIT score into Data Set A (60%) and Data Set B (40%). A frailty model allowing multiple procedures per patient was fit using Data Set A, with PADIT score as the only predictor, excluding patients with prior CIED infection. A data set of 54 042 index procedures among 51 623 patients with 574 infections was extracted. Among patients with no history of prior CIED infection, a 1 unit increase in the PADIT score was associated with a relative 28% increase in infection risk. Prior CIED infection was associated with significant incremental predictive value (HR 5.66, P<br />Graphical Abstract

Details

ISSN :
15322092 and 10995129
Volume :
23
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
EP Europace
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....b28d94d04fa78e889093d92989ae4ada