Back to Search Start Over

Differences in experiences of barriers to STI testing between clients of the internet-based diagnostic testing service GetCheckedOnline.com and an STI clinic in Vancouver, Canada

Authors :
Kimberly Thomson
Travis Salway
Mark Gilbert
Jean Shoveller
Chris Buchner
Devon Haag
Gina Ogilvie
Mel Krajden
Christopher K Fairley
Troy Grennan
Perry Kendall
Source :
Sexually Transmitted Infections
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
BMJ, 2018.

Abstract

ObjectivesInternet-based STI testing programmes may overcome barriers posed by in-clinic testing, though uptake could reflect social gradients. The role these services play in comparison to clinical testing services is unknown. We compared experiences of testing barriers between STI clinic clients to clients of GetCheckedOnline.com (GCO; where clients take a printed lab form to a lab).MethodsOur 10-month cross-sectional study was conducted after GCO was promoted to STI clinic clients and men who have sex with men (MSM). Clinic and GCO clients completed an online survey assessing testing barriers and facilitators; responses were compared using bivariate analysis (level of significance PResultsCompared with 321 clinic clients, the 73 GCO clients were more likely to be older (median 35 vs 30 years), MSM (45% vs 16%), be testing routinely (67% vs 39%), have delayed testing for any reason (76% vs 54%) and due to clinic distance (28% vs 9%), report delays due to wait times (50% vs 17%), embarrassment with testing (16% vs 6%), discomfort discussing sexual health where they usually go for testing (39% vs 22%), as well as discomfort discussing sexual history with (19% vs 5%) and fearing judgement from (30% vs 15%) any healthcare provider. GCO clients were less likely to have found clinic hours convenient (59% vs 77%) and clinic appointments easy to make (49% vs 66%), and more likely to report long wait times (50% vs 17%). We found no differences in technology skills/use.ConclusionsIn this urban setting, an internet-based testing service effectively engaged individuals experiencing testing barriers, with few social gradients in uptake. While some testing barriers could be addressed through increasing access to clinical services, others require social and structural changes, highlighting the importance of internet-based STI testing services to increasing test uptake.

Details

ISSN :
14723263 and 13684973
Volume :
95
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Sexually Transmitted Infections
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....b2f28b11b1e43d4c22e5832462ab1842
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2017-053325