Back to Search
Start Over
Increased angiogenic sprouting in poor prognosis FL is associated with elevated numbers of CD163+ macrophages within the immediate sprouting microenvironment
- Source :
- Blood. 115:5053-5056
- Publication Year :
- 2010
- Publisher :
- American Society of Hematology, 2010.
-
Abstract
- Follicular lymphoma has considerable clinical heterogeneity, and there is a need for easily quantifiable prognostic biomarkers. Microvessel density has been shown to be a useful prognostic factor based on numerical assessment of vessel numbers within histologic sections in some studies, but assessment of tumor neovascularization through angiogenic sprouting may be more relevant. We therefore examined the smallest vessels, single-staining structures measuring less than 30 μm2 in area, seen within histologic sections, and confirmed that they were neovascular angiogenic sprouts using extended focal imaging. Tissue microarrays composing diagnostic biopsies from patients at the extremes of survival of follicular lymphoma were analyzed with respect to numbers of these sprouts. This analysis revealed higher angiogenic activity in the poor prognostic group and demonstrated an association between increased sprouting and elevated numbers of infiltrating CD163+ macrophages within the immediate microenvironment surrounding the neovascular sprout.
- Subjects :
- Pathology
medicine.medical_specialty
Angiogenesis
Biopsy
Immunology
Follicular lymphoma
Antigens, Differentiation, Myelomonocytic
Receptors, Cell Surface
Biology
Biochemistry
Neovascularization
Antigens, CD
Biomarkers, Tumor
medicine
Humans
Lymphoma, Follicular
Lymphoid Neoplasia
Tissue microarray
Neovascularization, Pathologic
medicine.diagnostic_test
Macrophages
Cell Biology
Hematology
Prognosis
medicine.disease
Lymphoma
Platelet Endothelial Cell Adhesion Molecule-1
cardiovascular system
medicine.symptom
CD163
Sprouting
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 15280020 and 00064971
- Volume :
- 115
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Blood
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....b2f311b05f359d404d22cea38864e589
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2009-11-253260