Back to Search Start Over

Impact of PTPN11 mutations on clinical outcome analyzed in 1529 patients with acute myeloid leukemia

Authors :
Stasik, Sebastian
Eckardt, Jan-Niklas
Kramer, Michael
Röllig, Christoph
Krämer, Alwin
Scholl, Sebastian
Hochhaus, Andreas
Crysandt, Martina
Brümmendorf, Tim H.
Naumann, Ralph
Steffen, Björn
Kunzmann, Volker
Einsele, Hermann
Schaich, Markus
Burchert, Andreas
Neubauer, Andreas
Schäfer-Eckart, Kerstin
Schliemann, Christoph
Krause, Stefan
Herbst, Regina
Hänel, Mathias
Frickhofen, Norbert
Noppeney, Richard
Kaiser, Ulrich
Baldus, Claudia D.
Kaufmann, Martin
Rácil, Zdenek
Platzbecker, Uwe
Berdel, Wolfgang E.
Mayer, Jiri
Serve, Hubert
Müller-Tidow, Carsten
Ehninger, Gerhard
Bornhäuser, Martin
Schetelig, Johannes
Middeke, Jan M.
Thiede, Christian
Schulz-Abelius, Armin
Trepel, Martin
Teichmann, Martina
Kiani, Alexander
Glaß, Bertram
Görner, Martin
Behringer, Dirk
Kullmer, Johannes
Lamberti, Christof
Schmidt-Hieber, Martin
Flaßhove, Michael
MacKensen, Andreas
Hanoun, Maher
Kiehl, Michael
Höffkes, H.-G.
Müller, Lutz Peter
Dürk, Heinz Albert
Held, Gerhard
Repp, Roland Peter
Baldus, Claudia
Chemnitz, Jens-Marcus
Klein, Stefan
Wilhelm, Martin
Schubert, Jörg
Meinhardt, Achim
Geer, Thomas
Ritter, Markus
Aulitzky, Walter Erich
Heinz, Natalia
Source :
Blood Adv
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

The tyrosine-protein phosphatase nonreceptor type 11 (PTPN11) is an important regulator of RAS signaling and frequently affected by mutations in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Despite the relevance for leukemogenesis and as a potential therapeutic target, the prognostic role is controversial. To investigate the prognostic impact of PTPN11 mutations, we analyzed 1529 adult AML patients using next-generation sequencing. PTPN11 mutations were detected in 106 of 1529 (6.93%) patients (median VAF: 24%) in dominant (36%) and subclonal (64%) configuration. Patients with PTPN11 mutations were associated with concomitant mutations in NPM1 (63%), DNMT3A (37%), and NRAS (21%) and had a higher rate of European LeukemiaNet (ELN) favorable cytogenetics (57.8% vs 39.1%; P < .001) and higher white blood cell counts (P = .007) compared with PTPN11 wild-type patients. In a multivariable analysis, PTPN11 mutations were independently associated with poor overall survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.75; P < .001), relapse-free survival (HR: 1.52; P = .013), and a lower rate of complete remission (odds ratio: 0.46; P = .008). Importantly, the deleterious effect of PTPN11 mutations was confined predominantly to the ELN favorable-risk group and patients with subclonal PTPN11 mutations (HR: 2.28; P < .001) but not found with dominant PTPN11 mutations (HR: 1.07; P = .775), presumably because of significant differences within the rate and spectrum of associated comutations. In conclusion, our data suggest an overall poor prognostic impact of PTPN11 mutations in AML, which is significantly modified by the underlying cytogenetics and the clonal context in which they occur.

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Blood Adv
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....b32bde1a0696b27ca69a0036759498b0