Back to Search Start Over

Left Ventricular Lead Location and Long-Term Outcomes in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Patients

Authors :
Annamaria Kosztin
Wojciech Zareba
Scott D. Solomon
Valentina Kutyifa
Arthur J. Moss
Yitschak Biton
Scott McNitt
Ilan Goldenberg
Helmut U. Klein
Vivien Klaudia Nagy
Jagmeet P. Singh
Béla Merkely
Attila Roka
Source :
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology. 4:1410-1420
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2018.

Abstract

The authors aimed to evaluate the association of left ventricular (LV) lead location and long-term outcomes in MADIT-CRT (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy).There is limited data on the association of lead location with long-term clinical outcomes in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D).The LV lead location was classified in 797 patients with CRT-D, in 569 patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB), in 228 patients with non-LBBB, and in 505 patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) only. Leads were classified into apical (n = 83) and non-apical (n = 486); with the non-apical LV leads further categorized into anterior (n = 99) and posterior/lateral (n = 387) within LBBB. All-cause mortality and heart failure (HF) events were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox analyses.In CRT-D patients with LBBB and posterior/lateral LV lead location, there was an association with a significant reduction in long-term all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.37 to 0.79; p = 0.001), and HF events (HR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.33 to 0.60; p 0.001) compared to an ICD only, accompanied with better LV reverse remodeling. CRT-D patients with LBBB and an anterior LV lead location were shown to be associated with a significant reduction in HF events compared to an ICD only (anterior HR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.30 to 0.82; p = 0.006); however, no association with mortality reduction was observed from CRT-D versus an ICD only. CRT-D was not associated with improved outcomes in non-LBBB patients, regardless of LV lead location.In mild HF patients with LBBB and an implanted CRT-D, lateral/posterior, and anterior LV lead locations are similarly associated with reduction in the risk of HF or death events compared to ICD alone. Mortality benefit derived from CRT-D is associated only with patients with lateral/posterior LV lead location. An apical LV lead location should be avoided due to the early risk of death whenever possible. (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy [MADIT-CRT], NCT00180271; Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Post Approval Registry [MADIT-CRT-PAR], NCT01294449; and MADIT-CRT Long-Term International Follow-Up Registry - Europe, NCT02060110).

Details

ISSN :
2405500X
Volume :
4
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....b359d679de0a2debff1fe5e5cc8355ff
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2018.07.006