Back to Search Start Over

Child and Parental Perspectives on Communication and Decision Making in Pediatric CKD: A Focus Group Study

Authors :
Laura J James
Mini Michael
Hui-Kim Yap
Susan L. Furth
Tom Blydt-Hansen
Michael Zappitelli
Allison Dart
Susan Samuel
Amanda Walker
Simon A. Carter
Stephen I. Alexander
Allison Tong
Camilla S. Hanson
Helen Currier
Talia Gutman
Steven McTaggart
Janis M. Dionne
Angela Ju
Aditi Sinha
Nicholas J. A. Webb
Debbie S. Gipson
Stuart L. Goldstein
Wolfgang C. Winkelmayer
Sarah Bernays
Jaap W. Groothoff
Detlef Bockenhauer
Jonathan C. Craig
Scott E. Wenderfer
Allison A. Eddy
Angelique F. Ralph
ARD - Amsterdam Reproduction and Development
Paediatric Nephrology
AGEM - Inborn errors of metabolism
APH - Quality of Care
APH - Methodology
Source :
American journal of kidney diseases, 72(4), 547-559. W.B. Saunders Ltd
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2018.

Abstract

Background & Objectives Effective communication and shared decision making improve quality of care and patient outcomes but can be particularly challenging in pediatric chronic disease because children depend on their parents and clinicians to manage complex health care and developmental needs. We aimed to describe the perspectives of children with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and their parents with regard to communication and decision making. Study Design Qualitative study. Setting & Participants Children with CKD (n=34) and parents (n=62) from 6 centers across 6 cities in Australia, Canada, and the United States participated in 16 focus groups. Analytical Approach Transcripts were analyzed thematically. Results We identified 4 themes: (1) disempowered by knowledge imbalance (unprepared and ill-informed, suspicion of censorship, and inadequacy as technicians), (2) recognizing own expertise (intuition and instinct unique to parental bond, emerging wisdom and confidence, identifying opportunities for control and inclusion, and empowering participation in children), (3) striving to assert own priorities (negotiating broader life impacts, choosing to defer decisional burden, overprotected and overruled, and struggling to voice own preferences), and (4) managing child's involvement (respecting child's expertise, attributing "risky" behaviors to rebellion, and protecting children from illness burden). Limitations Only English-speaking participants were recruited, which may limit the transferability of the findings. We collected data from child and parent perspectives; however, clinician perspectives may provide further understanding of the difficulties of communication and decision making in pediatrics. Conclusions Parents value partnership with clinicians and consider long-term and quality-of-life implications of their child's illness. Children with CKD want more involvement in treatment decision making but are limited by vulnerability, fear, and uncertainty. There is a need to support the child to better enable him or her to become a partner in decision making and prepare him or her for adulthood. Collaborative and informed decision making that addresses the priorities and concerns of both children and parents is needed.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
02726386
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
American journal of kidney diseases, 72(4), 547-559. W.B. Saunders Ltd
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....b3bd039f4fdb9d51e6d5395043b9c96f