Back to Search
Start Over
A comparison of faxed referrals and eConsult questions for rheumatology referrals: a descriptive study
- Source :
- CMAJ Open
- Publication Year :
- 2021
- Publisher :
- CMA Joule Inc., 2021.
-
Abstract
- Background In Canada, wait times for access to specialized rheumatology services have increased, leading to new strategies to improve timely care; electronic consultations (eConsults) enable providers to ask specialists a clinical question using a secure platform, often reducing the need for a face-to-face visit. In this study, we sought to compare the types of referrals received through fax versus eConsult and to determine whether faxed referrals could be addressed using eConsult. Methods We conducted a descriptive study of consecutive faxed referrals sent to a tertiary care centre between Feb. 1 and Mar. 6, 2017, and a convenience sample of eConsults directed to rheumatology between Feb. 1, 2015, and Sept. 30, 2016, through the Champlain BASE eConsult Service, an Ontario-based service. We reviewed all referrals and categorized them by clinical content and question type. A rheumatologist with experience completing eConsult referrals assessed faxed referrals for their suitability to be answered through eConsults. Descriptive statistics were generated. Results We analyzed 300 consecutive faxed referrals and 300 (of 470) eConsult referrals. Faxed questions more often pertained to rheumatoid arthritis (32/300 [10.7%] v. 17/300 [5.7%]), systemic lupus erythematosus (24/300 [8.0%] v. 10/300 [3.3%]), and polyarthritis (30/300 [10.0%] v. 18/300 [6.0%]). eConsults more often addressed abnormal serology without joint symptoms (27/300 [9.0%] v. 8/300 [2.7%]) and gout (15/300 [5.0%] v. 4/300 [1.3%]). Faxed referrals were more likely to have no specific question (116/300 [38.7%]), and eConsults were more likely to have more than 1 question posed (99/300 [33.0%]) and a drug-related question (67/300 [22.3%]). The rheumatologist identified potential benefit from eConsult in 216/300 (72.0%) faxed referrals and 55/59 (93.2%) declined faxed referrals. Interpretation Despite differences in diagnosis between eConsults and faxed referrals, most faxed referrals showed the potential to be addressed through eConsult. Using eConsult may allow primary care providers to obtain answers to questions without requesting a face-to-face specialist referral, or provide support for patients awaiting face-to-face consultation.
- Subjects :
- Adult
Male
medicine.medical_specialty
education
MEDLINE
Convenience sample
Primary care
Tertiary care
Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Tertiary Care Centers
Rheumatology
Internal medicine
Humans
Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
Medicine
Referral and Consultation
Aged
Telefacsimile
Specialist referral
business.industry
Arthritis
Remote Consultation
Research
General Medicine
Middle Aged
Clinical question
Family medicine
Female
Descriptive research
business
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 22910026
- Volume :
- 9
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- CMAJ Open
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....b464745dcf1c560e66b9aae2dfef95e7
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20200025