Back to Search Start Over

Rapid quantitative D‐dimer to exclude pulmonary embolism: a prospective cohort management study

Authors :
S. Takach Lapner
Shannon M. Bates
Jim A. Julian
Peter L. Gross
Lori-Ann Linkins
J. I. Weitz
Frederick A. Spencer
Sam Schulman
James D. Douketis
Agnes Y.Y. Lee
Sameer Parpia
Clive Kearon
Mark Crowther
J. Ginsberg
Wendy Lim
Source :
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 14:504-509
Publication Year :
2016
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2016.

Abstract

ESSENTIALS: It is not known if D-dimer testing alone can safely exclude pulmonary embolism (PE). We studied the safety of using a quantitative latex agglutination D-dimer to exclude PE in 808 patients. 52% of patients with suspected PE had a negative D-dimer test and were followed for 3 months. The negative predictive value of D-dimer testing alone was 99.8%, suggesting it may safely exclude PE. Background Strategies are needed to exclude pulmonary embolism (PE) efficiently without the need for imaging tests. Although validated rules for clinical probability assessment can be combined with D-dimer testing to safely exclude PE, the rules can be complicated or partially subjective, which limits their use. Objectives To determine if PE can be safely excluded in patients with a negative D-dimer without incorporating clinical probability assessment. Patients/methods We enrolled consecutive outpatients and inpatients with suspected PE from four tertiary care hospitals. All patients underwent D-dimer testing using the MDA D-dimer test, a quantitative latex agglutination assay. PE was excluded in patients with a D-dimer less than 750 μg FEU L(-1) without further testing. Patients with D-dimer levels of 750 μg FEU L(-1) or higher underwent standardized imaging tests for PE. All patients in whom PE was excluded had anticoagulant therapy withheld and were followed for 3 months for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Suspected events during follow-up were adjudicated centrally. Results Eight hundred and eight patients were enrolled, of whom 99 (12%) were diagnosed with VTE at presentation. Four hundred and twenty (52%) patients had a negative D-dimer level at presentation and were not treated with anticoagulants; of these, one had VTE during follow-up. The negative predictive value of D-dimer testing for PE was 99.8% (95% confidence interval, 98.7-99.9%). Conclusions A negative latex agglutination D-dimer assay is seen in about one-half of patients with suspected PE and reliably excludes PE as a stand-alone test.

Details

ISSN :
15387836
Volume :
14
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....b492f72bc73fab4849ab47bba6bc90a1