Back to Search Start Over

1-Year Outcomes of Angina Management Guided by Invasive Coronary Function Testing (CorMicA)

Authors :
Keith G. Oldroyd
Robert McDade
Alex McConnachie
Christopher Rush
Colin Berry
Novalia Sidik
Eric Yii
Mitchell Lindsay
Rhian M. Touyz
Bethany Stanley
Ross McGeoch
David Corcoran
Richard Good
Naveed Sattar
Paul Rocchiccioli
Peter McCartney
Stuart Watkins
Stuart Hood
Hany Eteiba
Thomas J. Ford
Margaret McEntegart
Aadil Shaukat
Keith Robertson
Damien Collison
Source :
Jacc. Cardiovascular Interventions
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Elsevier, 2020.

Abstract

Objectives The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that invasive coronary function testing at time of angiography could help stratify management of angina patients without obstructive coronary artery disease. Background Medical therapy for angina guided by invasive coronary vascular function testing holds promise, but the longer-term effects on quality of life and clinical events are unknown among patients without obstructive disease. Methods A total of 151 patients with angina with symptoms and/or signs of ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease were randomized to stratified medical therapy guided by an interventional diagnostic procedure versus standard care (control group with blinded interventional diagnostic procedure results). The interventional diagnostic procedure–facilitated diagnosis (microvascular angina, vasospastic angina, both, or neither) was linked to guideline-based management. Pre-specified endpoints included 1-year patient-reported outcome measures (Seattle Angina Questionnaire, quality of life [EQ-5D]) and major adverse cardiac events (all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, unstable angina hospitalization or revascularization, heart failure hospitalization, and cerebrovascular event) at subsequent follow-up. Results Between November 2016 and December 2017, 151 patients with ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease were randomized (n = 75 to the intervention group, n = 76 to the control group). At 1 year, overall angina (Seattle Angina Questionnaire summary score) improved in the intervention group by 27% (difference 13.6 units; 95% confidence interval: 7.3 to 19.9; p<br />Central Illustration

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
18767605 and 19368798
Volume :
13
Issue :
1
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Jacc. Cardiovascular Interventions
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....b4be3fad335e76be77d7143bc064fc98