Back to Search Start Over

Acceptability and Feasibility of Early Identification of Mental Health Difficulties in Primary Schools: A Qualitative Exploration of UK School Staff and Parents’ Perceptions

Authors :
Childs-Fegredo, J.
Burn, A.-M.
Duschinsky, R.
Humphrey, A.
Ford, T.
Jones, P. B.
Howarth, E.
Childs-Fegredo, J. [0000-0001-6447-0034]
Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository
Childs-Fegredo, J [0000-0001-6447-0034]
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Springer US, 2020.

Abstract

Funder: University of Cambridge<br />One in eight children aged 5–19 years in the UK suffer from a psychiatric disorder, while fewer than 35% are identified and only 25% of children access mental health services. Whilst government policy states that primary schools are well-placed to spot the early warning signs of mental health issues in children, the implementation of early identification methods in schools remains under-researched. This study aims to increase understanding of the acceptability and feasibility of different early identification methods in this setting. Four primary schools in the East of England in the UK participated in a qualitative exploration of views about different methods that might enhance the early identification of mental health difficulties (MHDs). Twenty-seven staff and 20 parents took part in semi-structured interviews to explore current and future strategies for identifying pupils at risk of experiencing MHDs. We presented participants with four examples of identification methods selected from a systematic review of the literature: a curriculum-based approach delivered to pupils, staff training, universal screening, and selective screening. We used NVivo to thematically code and analyse the data, examining which models were perceived as acceptable and feasible as well as participants’ explanations for their beliefs. Three main themes were identified; benefits and facilitators; barriers and harms, and the need for a tailored approach to implementation. Parents and staff perceived staff training as the most acceptable and feasible approach to systematic identification, followed by a curriculum-based approach. Universal and selective screening garnered mixed responses. Findings suggest that a systematic and tailored approach to early identification would be most acceptable and feasible, taking into consideration school context. Teacher training should be a core component in all schools.

Details

ISSN :
18662625 and 18662633
Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....b533f3fc2c10b975a906222ffe680931