Back to Search
Start Over
An overview of methods and empirical comparison of aggregate data and individual patient data results for investigating heterogeneity in meta-analysis of time-to-event outcomes
- Source :
- Journal of evaluation in clinical practice. 11(5)
- Publication Year :
- 2005
-
Abstract
- Combining the results of individual studies using meta-analysis may be undertaken using either aggregate data (AD) or individual patient data (IPD). In any meta-analysis it is important to consider statistical heterogeneity between studies. Potential sources of heterogeneity can be explored using regression models with either AD or IPD. An overview of approaches and empirical assessment of how the results and conclusions differ from these analyses is undertaken using a meta-analysis of five randomized controlled trials comparing two antiepileptic drugs with time-to-event outcomes. Alternative meta-regression models using AD are compared to stratified Cox regression models using IPD. Age as a potential cause of heterogeneity is detected by both AD and IPD regression models. Time from first ever seizure to randomization is only identified by some AD models. A more thorough explanation of heterogeneity is obtained from the model using IPD but further empirical evidence comparing IPD and AD results are needed.
- Subjects :
- Male
Clinical Trials as Topic
Epilepsy
Proportional hazards model
Health Policy
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Regression analysis
bacterial infections and mycoses
Confidence interval
law.invention
Study heterogeneity
Randomized controlled trial
Meta-Analysis as Topic
law
Meta-analysis
Data Interpretation, Statistical
Statistics
Confidence Intervals
Humans
Regression Analysis
Aggregate data
Meta-regression
Female
Psychology
Proportional Hazards Models
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 13561294
- Volume :
- 11
- Issue :
- 5
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Journal of evaluation in clinical practice
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....b5e0afacba64f5fa2bc1ddbfdafd2a76