Back to Search Start Over

Stunning methods and slaughter of rabbits for human consumption

Authors :
EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW)
Saxmose Nielsen, Søren
Alvarez, Julio
Bicout, Dominique Joseph
Calistri, Paolo
Depner, Klaus
Drewe, Julian Ashley
Garin-Bastuji, Bruno
Gonzales Rojas, Jose Luis
Gortázar Schmidt, Christian
Michel, Virginie
Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel
Roberts, Helen Clare
Sihvonen, Liisa Helena
Stahl, Karl
Velarde Calvo, Antonio
Viltrop, Arvo
Winckler, Christoph
Candiani, Denise
Fabris, Chiara
Mosbach-Schulz, Olaf
Van der Stede, Yves
Spoolder, Hans
Producció Animal
Benestar Animal
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine
Departments of Faculty of Veterinary Medicine
Source :
IRTA Pubpro. Open Digital Archive, Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentàries (IRTA), EFSA Journal, Vol 18, Iss 1, Pp n/a-n/a (2020), Nielsen, S S, Alvarez, J, Bicout, D J, Calistri, P, Depner, K, Drewe, J A, Garin-Bastuji, B, Rojas, J L G, Schmidt, C G, Michel, V, Chueca, M A M, Roberts, H C, Sihvonen, L H, Stahl, K, Calvo, A V, Viltrop, A, Winckler, C, Candiani, D, Fabris, C, Mosbach-Schulz, O, Van der Stede, Y & Spoolder, H 2020, ' Stunning methods and slaughter of rabbits for human consumption ', EFSA Journal, vol. 18, 5927 . https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5927, EFSA Journal, Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC, instname
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Wiley, 2020.

Abstract

EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW).<br />This opinion on the killing of rabbits for human consumption (‘slaughtering’) responds to two mandates: one from the European Parliament (EP) and the other from the European Commission. The opinion describes stunning methods for rabbits known to the experts in the EFSA working group, which can be used in commercial practice, and which are sufficiently described in scientific and technical literature for the development of an opinion. These are electrical stunning, mechanical stunning with a penetrative and non‐penetrative captive bolt and gas stunning. The latter method is not allowed in the EU anymore following Council Regulation (EC) No 1099/2009, but may still be practiced elsewhere in the world. Related hazards and welfare consequences are also evaluated. To monitor stunning effectiveness as requested by the EP mandate, the opinion suggests the use of indicators for the state of consciousness, selected on the basis of their sensitivity, specificity and ease of use. Similarly, it suggests indicators to confirm animals are dead before dressing. For the European Commission mandate, slaughter processes were assessed from the arrival of rabbits in containers until their death, and grouped in three main phases: pre‐stunning (including arrival, unloading of containers from the truck, lairage, handling/removing of rabbits from containers), stunning (including restraint) and bleeding (including bleeding following stunning and bleeding during slaughter without stunning). Ten welfare consequences resulting from the hazards that rabbits can be exposed to during slaughter are identified: consciousness, animal not dead, thermal stress (heat or cold stress), prolonged thirst, prolonged hunger, restriction of movements, pain, fear, distress and respiratory distress. Welfare consequences and relevant animal‐based measures (indicators) are described. Outcome tables linking hazards, welfare consequences, indicators, origins, preventive and corrective measures are developed for each process. Mitigation measures to minimise welfare consequences are also proposed.

Details

ISSN :
18314732
Volume :
18
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
EFSA Journal
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....b63b44e447dfcc56ec252ca58fa76c01