Back to Search
Start Over
Anthropometry and the Risk of Lung Cancer in EPIC
- Source :
- American Journal of Epidemiology, 184, 2, pp. 129-139, American Journal of Epidemiology, 184(2), 129. Oxford University Press, American Journal of Epidemiology, 184, 129-139, Dewi, N U, Boshuizen, H C, Johansson, M, Vineis, P, Kampman, E, Steffen, A, Tjønneland, A, Halkjær, J, Overvad, K, Severi, G, Fagherazzi, G, Boutron-Ruault, M-C, Kaaks, R, Li, K, Boeing, H, Trichopoulou, A, Bamia, C, Klinaki, E, Tumino, R, Palli, D, Mattiello, A, Tagliabue, G, Peeters, P H, Vermeulen, R, Weiderpass, E, Torhild Gram, I, Huerta, J M, Agudo, A, Sánchez, M-J, Ardanaz, E, Dorronsoro, M, Quirós, J R, Sonestedt, E, Johansson, M, Grankvist, K, Key, T, Khaw, K-T, Wareham, N, Cross, A J, Norat, T, Riboli, E, Fanidi, A, Muller, D & Bueno-de-Mesquita, H B 2016, ' Anthropometry and the Risk of Lung Cancer in EPIC ', American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 184, no. 2, pp. 129-39 . https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwv298, American Journal of Epidemiology 184 (2016) 2, American Journal of Epidemiology, 184(2), 129-139
- Publication Year :
- 2016
-
Abstract
- The associations of body mass index (BMI) and other anthropometric measurements with lung cancer were examined in 348,108 participants in the European Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) between 1992 and 2010. The study population included 2,400 case patients with incident lung cancer, and the average length of follow-up was 11 years. Hazard ratios were calculated using Cox proportional hazard models in which we modeled smoking variables with cubic splines. Overall, there was a significant inverse association between BMI (weight (kg)/height (m)(2)) and the risk of lung cancer after adjustment for smoking and other confounders (for BMI of 30.0-34.9 versus 18.5-25.0, hazard ratio = 0.72, 95% confidence interval: 0.62, 0.84). The strength of the association declined with increasing follow-up time. Conversely, after adjustment for BMI, waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio were significantly positively associated with lung cancer risk (for the highest category of waist circumference vs. the lowest, hazard ratio = 1.25, 95% confidence interval: 1.05, 1.50). Given the decline of the inverse association between BMI and lung cancer over time, the association is likely at least partly due to weight loss resulting from preclinical lung cancer that was present at baseline. Residual confounding by smoking could also have influenced our findings.
- Subjects :
- Male
obesity
Lung Neoplasms
Nutrition and Disease
Epidemiology
Comorbidity
waist to hip ratio
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
Tumours of the digestive tract Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 14]
0302 clinical medicine
Waist–hip ratio
Voeding en Ziekte
Multicenter Studies as Topic
Medicine
Prospective Studies
030212 general & internal medicine
POPULATION
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
Human Nutrition & Health
Waist-to-height ratio
Anthropometry
Hazard ratio
Humane Voeding & Gezondheid
Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic
11 Medical And Health Sciences
Middle Aged
waist circumference
Europe
LEANNESS
030220 oncology & carcinogenesis
Female
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Adult
medicine.medical_specialty
Waist
body mass index
waist-to-height ratio
Risk Assessment
smoking
03 medical and health sciences
Journal Article
Humans
COHORT
Lung cancer
waist-to-heigh ratio
METAANALYSIS
01 Mathematical Sciences
Aged
Proportional Hazards Models
VLAG
MODEL ANALYSIS
Science & Technology
Waist-Hip Ratio
business.industry
Proportional hazards model
CURRENT SMOKERS
Cancer
FAT DISTRIBUTION
medicine.disease
Diet
Surgery
BODY-MASS INDEX
lung cancer
business
Body mass index
Demography
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 00029262
- Volume :
- 184
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- American Journal of Epidemiology
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....b7bcfa3d4b01e15f883d5213eb045067
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwv298