Back to Search
Start Over
The Influence of Subjects and Environment on Audiovisual Subjective Tests: An International Study
- Source :
- IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, IEEE, 2012, 6 (6), pp. 640-651. ⟨10.1109/JSTSP.2012.2215306⟩
- Publication Year :
- 2012
- Publisher :
- HAL CCSD, 2012.
-
Abstract
- International audience; Traditionally, audio quality and video quality are evaluated separately in subjective tests. Best practices within the quality assessment community were developed before many modern mobile audiovisual devices and services came into use, such as internet video, smart phones, tablets and connected televisions. These devices and services raise unique questions that require jointly evaluating both the audio and the video within a subjective test. However, audiovisual subjective testing is a relatively under-explored field. In this paper, we address the question of determining the most suitable way to conduct audiovisual subjective testing on a wide range of audiovisual quality. Six laboratories from four countries conducted a systematic study of audiovisual subjective testing. The stimuli and scale were held constant across experiments and labs; only the environment of the subjective test was varied. Some subjective tests were conducted in controlled environments and some in public environments (a cafeteria, patio or hallway). The audiovisual stimuli spanned a wide range of quality. Results show that these audiovisual subjective tests were highly repeatable from one laboratory and environment to the next. The number of subjects was the most important factor. Based on this experiment, 24 or more subjects are recommended for Absolute Category Rating (ACR) tests. In public environments, 35 subjects were required to obtain the same Student.s t-test sensitivity. The second most important variable was individual differences between subjects. Other environmental factors had minimal impact, such as language, country, lighting, background noise, wall color, and monitor calibration. Analyses indicate that Mean Opinion Scores (MOS) are relative rather than absolute. Our analyses show that the results of experiments done in pristine, laboratory environments are highly representative of those devices in actual use, in a typical user environment.
- Subjects :
- Audiovisual Quality
Absolute Category Rating
Computer science
media_common.quotation_subject
Applied psychology
02 engineering and technology
computer.software_genre
Video quality
Environment Effect
[INFO.INFO-TS]Computer Science [cs]/Signal and Image Processing
0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering
Quality (business)
Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Sound quality
Audio signal processing
Subjective video quality
media_common
Language Effect
Multimedia
Subjective Testing
020206 networking & telecommunications
MOS
Test (assessment)
Signal Processing
020201 artificial intelligence & image processing
computer
[SPI.SIGNAL]Engineering Sciences [physics]/Signal and Image processing
Internet video
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 19324553
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, IEEE, 2012, 6 (6), pp. 640-651. ⟨10.1109/JSTSP.2012.2215306⟩
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....b8a95eb53d22b78af166d19afc1f0072
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTSP.2012.2215306⟩