Immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery: The rationale, implementation, and beliefs of ophthalmic surgeons across Europe

Purpose To assess the attitudes and beliefs held toward immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery (ISBCS), including estimating the incidence of European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS) members currently performing ISBCS, exploring the barriers of ISBCS implementation, and assessing the relevance of these findings to practice in the United Kingdom. Setting European consultant members of the ESCRS. Design Survey-based questionnaire. Methods The survey was sent and collected electronically. An initial screening question directed the rest of the survey; participants were asked to rate the importance of several factors with regard to performing ISBCS. Free text options were also available. Descriptive analysis was performed. Results Of the 2200 recipients, 303 (13.7%) responded, of which 247 were eligible for analysis. Of the 247 eligible respondents, 166 (67.2%) reported performing ISBCS, 71 (28.7%) said they did not perform ISBCS, and 10 (4.0%) said they had previously done so but have since stopped. Of those who were currently practicing ISBCS, the three most important factors to consider were all directly related to infection risk. Of those who did not perform ISBCS, the most important reasons for not performing the surgery were a risk for endophthalmitis (69.0%) and the medicolegal issues should ISBCS go wrong (57.8%). The most common reason for stopping ISBCS was that the respondent no longer believed in the benefit of ISBCS (n = 4). Conclusions The survey reflects ophthalmologists' concerns regarding infection and medicolegal risks; however, reports of bilateral endophthalmitis are extremely rare when the correct recommendations are followed. The findings from this survey could be used to inform service provision of ISBCS in the U.K., taking into consideration the voices of colleagues overseas.