Back to Search Start Over

Economic evaluation of four angiotensin II receptor blockers in the treatment of hypertension

Authors :
Krishnan Ramaswamy
Mark J. Cziraky
Sumeet Panjabi
Dingwei Dai
Rolin L Wade
Lesley-Ann Miller
Source :
Current medical research and opinion. 26(6)
Publication Year :
2010

Abstract

To evaluate the cost effectiveness of achieving JNC 7 blood pressure goals with angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs).Cost effectiveness of olmesartan, losartan, valsartan, and irbesartan was compared with real world patient chart and claims data from a large US health plan. Patients 18 and older withor=2 claims for an ARB between May 1, 2002 and December 31, 2005 were identified from the claims database. Patients with a diagnosis of hypertension in the 6-month baseline period before the first (index) ARB claim and ARB-free during baseline were included. Medical charts were randomly sampled from the cohort of identified patients; effectiveness data were obtained from charts and linked to healthcare claims and costs. These data were used to populate the decision analytic model.All-cause and hypertension-attributable costs to achieve JNC 7 goals were measured. Comparisons were made within low and high-dose strata and pooled across ARB doses.121 472 patients were identified, and charts were randomly abstracted for 1600. Of these, 1293 patients were hypertensive at index. Baseline patient characteristics for the chart group were modestly different from the larger cohort. More patients treated with olmesartan (77.8%) than with losartan (66.5%), valasartan (68.8%), or irbesartan (68.8%) achieved JNC 7 BP goals. In pooled-dose comparisons, cost per patient reaching BP goal was $8964 (all-cause) and $2704 (hypertension-attributable) for olmesartan; compared with $10 848 and $3291 for losartan; $10 557 and $3577 for valsartan; and $13395 and $4325 for irbesartan, respectively. The trend was similar for the dose stratification analysis, except in the comparison between high-dose losartan and olmesartan, where losartan had a lower cost-effectiveness ratio.Overall olmesartan was the most effective and cost-saving treatment option compared to losartan, valsartan, and irbesartan for the achievement of JNC 7 BP goals in this managed-care population.

Details

ISSN :
14734877
Volume :
26
Issue :
6
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Current medical research and opinion
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....bb0b44bdae3feb56420be82545cdbc9f