Back to Search Start Over

GIS-based landslide susceptibility modeling: A comparison between fuzzy multi-criteria and machine learning algorithms

Authors :
Sk Ajim Ali
Nguyen Thi Thuy Linh
Ljubomir Gigović
Matej Vojtek
Jana Vojteková
Quoc Bao Pham
Ateeque Ahmad
Farhana Parvin
Mohammad Ali Ghorbani
Romulus Costache
Source :
Geoscience Frontiers, Vol 12, Iss 2, Pp 857-876 (2021)
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Elsevier, 2021.

Abstract

Hazards and disasters have always negative impacts on the way of life. Landslide is an overwhelming natural as well as man-made disaster that causes loss of natural resources and human properties throughout the world. The present study aimed to assess and compare the prediction efficiency of different models in landslide susceptibility in the Kysuca river basin, Slovakia. In this regard, the fuzzy decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory combining with the analytic network process (FDEMATEL-ANP), Naive Bayes (NB) classifier, and random forest (RF) classifier were considered. Initially, a landslide inventory map was produced with 2000 landslide and non-landslide points by randomly divided with a ratio of 70%:30% for training and testing, respectively. The geospatial database for assessing the landslide susceptibility was generated with the help of 16 landslide conditioning factors by allowing for topographical, hydrological, lithological, and land cover factors. The ReliefF method was considered for determining the significance of selected conditioning factors and inclusion in the model building. Consequently, the landslide susceptibility maps (LSMs) were generated using the FDEMATEL-ANP, Naive Bayes (NB) classifier, and random forest (RF) classifier models. Finally, the area under curve (AUC) and different arithmetic evaluation were used for validating and comparing the results and models. The results revealed that random forest (RF) classifier is a promising and optimum model for landslide susceptibility in the study area with a very high value of area under curve (AUC = 0.954), lower value of mean absolute error (MAE = 0.1238) and root mean square error (RMSE = 0.2555), and higher value of Kappa index (K = 0.8435) and overall accuracy (OAC = 92.2%).

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
16749871
Volume :
12
Issue :
2
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Geoscience Frontiers
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....bccef515621fe1a7254da28bd2be9b94