Back to Search
Start Over
Renal tubular damage and worsening renal function in chronic heart failure
- Source :
- Clinical Cardiology, 43(6), 630-638. Wiley, Clinical Cardiology, Clinical Cardiology, 43(6), 630-638. Wiley-Blackwell
- Publication Year :
- 2020
-
Abstract
- Background It is uncertain that chronic heart failure (CHF) patients are susceptible to renal tubular damage with that of worsening renal function (WRF) preceding clinical outcomes.Hypothesis Changes in tubular damage biomarkers are stronger predictors of subsequent clinical events than changes in creatinine (Cr), and both have different clinical determinants.Methods During 2.2 years, we repeatedly simultaneously collected a median of 9 blood and 8 urine samples per patient in 263 CHF patients. We determined the slopes (rates of change) of the biomarker trajectories for plasma (Cr) and urinary tubular damage biomarkers N-acetyl-beta-d-glucosaminidase (NAG), and kidney-injury-molecule (KIM)-1. The degree of tubular injury was ranked according to NAG and KIM-1 slopes: increase in neither, increase in either, or increase in both; WRF was defined as increasing Cr slope. The composite endpoint comprised HF-hospitalization, cardiac death, left ventricular assist device placement, and heart transplantation.Results Higher baseline NT-proBNP and lower eGFR predicted more severe tubular damage (adjusted odds ratio, adj. OR [95%CI, 95% confidence interval] per doubling NT-proBNP: 1.26 [1.07-1.49]; per 10 mL/min/1.73 m(2) eGFR decrease 1.16 [1.03-1.31]). Higher loop diuretic doses, lower aldosterone antagonist doses, and higher eGFR predicted WRF (furosemide per 40 mg increase: 1.32 [1.08-1.62]; spironolactone per 25 mg decrease: 1.76 [1.07-2.89]; per 10 mL/min/1.73 m(2) eGFR increase: 1.40 [1.20-1.63]). WRF and higher rank of tubular injury individually entailed higher risk of the composite endpoint (adjusted hazard ratios, adj. HR [95%CI]: WRF 1.9 [1.1-3.4], tubular 8.4 [2.6-27.9]; when combined risk was highest 15.0 [2.0-111.0]).Conclusion Slopes of tubular damage and WRF biomarkers had different clinical determinants. Both predicted clinical outcome, but this association was stronger for tubular injury. Prognostic effects of both appeared independent and additive.
- Subjects :
- Male
medicine.medical_specialty
medicine.drug_class
medicine.medical_treatment
Clinical Investigations
Urology
Renal function
heart failure
COLLABORATION
chemistry.chemical_compound
Humans
Medicine
Prospective Studies
Renal Insufficiency
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Heart transplantation
Creatinine
business.industry
Hazard ratio
Furosemide
tubular injury
General Medicine
Middle Aged
Loop diuretic
IMPAIRMENT
Prognosis
medicine.disease
Kidney Tubules
chemistry
Heart failure
worsening renal function
SYSTOLIC DYSFUNCTION
Spironolactone
Female
cardiorenal interaction
KIDNEY INJURY
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
business
Biomarkers
tubular damage biomarkers
CARDIORENAL SYNDROME
Follow-Up Studies
Glomerular Filtration Rate
medicine.drug
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 01609289
- Volume :
- 43
- Issue :
- 6
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Clinical Cardiology
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....be27da55eea05b6459d4bc2de79e5131