Back to Search Start Over

Prospective Controlled Animal Study on Biopsy Sampling with New Flexible Cryoprobes versus Forceps: Evaluation of Biopsy Size, Histological Quality and Bleeding Risk

Authors :
Jürgen Hetzel
Christiane Brueckner
Karl-Josef Franke
Georg Nilius
Markus Enderle
Karl-Heinz Rühle
Dirk Theegarten
Mara Szyrach
Martin Hetzel
Claus Hann von Weyhern
Source :
Respiration. 80:127-132
Publication Year :
2010
Publisher :
S. Karger AG, 2010.

Abstract

Background: Cryoextraction is a procedure used for the recanalization of obstructed airways caused by visible exophytic endobronchial tumor. Biopsy samples obtained by this technique have been shown to be useful for histological assessment. Objectives: The aim of the present animal study was to systematically evaluate biopsy size, histological quality and bleeding risk after cryobiopsy with new, flexible cryoprobes in comparison with forceps biopsy, serving as the gold standard. Methods: Biopsies were obtained from anesthetized pigs with the flexible bronchoscopy technique, and evaluated histologically with respect to their size and quality. Bleeding frequency, bleeding duration and histological changes in the biopsy bed were also recorded. Results: Cryobiopsies were significantly larger than forceps biopsies. The size of cryobiopsies was dependent on the freezing time. The histological quality of the cryobiopsy specimenswas not impaired by the freezing process, whereas forceps biopsies showed typical crush artifacts. Despite the larger defects left in the tracheobronchial system after cryobiopsy, bleeding frequency and duration were not higher compared to forceps biopsy. Conclusions: Since cryobiopsy sampling is not associated with a higher bleeding risk compared with forceps biopsy, this new biopsy technique offers – in addition to a good specimen quality – a safe and valuable tool with the potential of improving the outcome of diagnostic endoscopy.

Details

ISSN :
14230356 and 00257931
Volume :
80
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Respiration
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....be343abffc842802e1f23f3d01665f5c
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1159/000287251