Back to Search
Start Over
Efficacy of recycled sand or organic solids as bedding sources for lactating cows housed in freestalls
- Source :
- Journal of dairy science. 102(7)
- Publication Year :
- 2018
-
Abstract
- Our objective was to compare the composition of bedding materials and manure, cow welfare and hygiene assessments, measures of milk production and quality, and incidence of mastitis during a 3-yr trial with lactating Holstein cows housed in a freestall barn containing 4 identical pens with 32 freestalls/pen. Bedding systems evaluated included deep-bedded organic manure solids (DBOS), shallow-bedded manure solids spread over mattresses (MAT), deep-bedded recycled sand (RSA), and deep-bedded new sand (NSA). The experiment was designed as a 4 × 4 Latin square with 4 bedding systems and 4 experimental periods, but was terminated after 3 yr following discussions with the consulting statistician; therefore, data were analyzed as an incomplete Latin square. A total of n = 734 mostly primiparous cows (n = 725 primiparous, n = 9 multiparous; 224 to 267 cows/yr) were enrolled in the trial. Before placement in freestalls, organic solids (OS) exhibited lower concentrations of dry matter (36.5 vs. 94.3%), and greater concentrations of volatile solids, C, N, NH4-N, P, water-extractable P, K, and S compared with RSA or NSA. Cow comfort index was greater for sand-bedded systems compared with those using OS (88.4 vs. 82.8%). Cows bedded in systems using OS (DBOS and MAT) exhibited greater mean hock scores (1 = no swelling, no hair loss; 2 = no swelling, bald area on hock) than those bedded in sand (1.25 vs. 1.04), but this effect was entirely associated with use of mattresses (MAT), which differed sharply from DBOS (1.42 vs. 1.07). Generally, hygiene scores for legs, flanks, and udders were numerically similar for DBOS, NSA, and RSA bedding systems, and differences between bedding systems were associated entirely with MAT, yielding detectable contrasts between MAT and DBOS for legs (2.94 vs. 2.20), flanks (2.34 vs. 1.68), and udders (1.83 vs. 1.38). No significant contrast comparing bedding systems was detected for measures of milk production or quality. Documented cases of clinical mastitis requiring treatment ranged from a low rate of 7.4 cases/yr for RSA to a high of 23.1 cases/yr for DBOS, based on a mean enrollment of 60.7 to 63.0 cows/treatment per yr. Cows bedded with OS exhibited a greater incidence of mastitis than those bedded with sand (19.0 vs. 8.4 cases/yr), but no differences were observed for comparisons within individual bedding-material types. Collectively, these results generally favored use of sand-bedding materials over systems using OS.
- Subjects :
- Bedding
Biology
Solid material
03 medical and health sciences
Random Allocation
Animal science
Latin square
Genetics
medicine
Animals
Lactation
Dry matter
Animal Husbandry
Mastitis, Bovine
030304 developmental biology
0303 health sciences
Incidence
0402 animal and dairy science
Hygiene
04 agricultural and veterinary sciences
medicine.disease
Milk production
Silicon Dioxide
040201 dairy & animal science
Manure
Housing, Animal
Mastitis
Dairying
Animal Science and Zoology
Cattle
Female
Barn (unit)
Food Science
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 15253198
- Volume :
- 102
- Issue :
- 7
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Journal of dairy science
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....be919ca1060593f7e710f827038e968a