Back to Search
Start Over
Assemblathon 2: evaluating de novo methods of genome assembly in three vertebrate species
- Source :
- GigaScience, GigaScience, 2013, 2 (1), pp.10. ⟨10.1186/2047-217X-2-10⟩, Bradnam, Keith R; Fass, Joseph N; Alexandrov, Anton; Baranay, Paul; Bechner, Michael; Birol, Inanç; et al.(2013). Assemblathon 2: evaluating de novo methods of genome assembly in three vertebrate species. GigaScience, 2(1), 10. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-217X-2-10. Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/96r138rs, GigaScience, BioMed Central, 2013, 2 (1), pp.10. ⟨10.1186/2047-217X-2-10⟩, Europe PubMed Central
- Publication Year :
- 2013
-
Abstract
- Background - The process of generating raw genome sequence data continues to become cheaper, faster, and more accurate. However, assembly of such data into high-quality, finished genome sequences remains challenging. Many genome assembly tools are available, but they differ greatly in terms of their performance (speed, scalability, hardware requirements, acceptance of newer read technologies) and in their final output (composition of assembled sequence). More importantly, it remains largely unclear how to best assess the quality of assembled genome sequences. The Assemblathon competitions are intended to assess current state-of-the-art methods in genome assembly. Results - In Assemblathon 2, we provided a variety of sequence data to be assembled for three vertebrate species (a bird, a fish, and snake). This resulted in a total of 43 submitted assemblies from 21 participating teams. We evaluated these assemblies using a combination of optical map data, Fosmid sequences, and several statistical methods. From over 100 different metrics, we chose ten key measures by which to assess the overall quality of the assemblies. Conclusions - Many current genome assemblers produced useful assemblies, containing a significant representation of their genes, regulatory sequences, and overall genome structure. However, the high degree of variability between the entries suggests that there is still much room for improvement in the field of genome assembly and that approaches which work well in assembling the genome of one species may not necessarily work well for another.<br />Comment: Additional files available at http://korflab.ucdavis.edu/Datasets/Assemblathon/Assemblathon2/Additional_files/ Major changes 1. Accessions for the 3 read data sets have now been included 2. New file: spreadsheet containing details of all Study, Sample, Run, & Experiment identifiers 3. Made miscellaneous changes to address reviewers comments. DOIs added to GigaDB datasets
- Subjects :
- [INFO.INFO-AR]Computer Science [cs]/Hardware Architecture [cs.AR]
Computer science
Sequence assembly
GENOMES
Health Informatics
Computational biology
Assessment
COMPASS
Genome
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
biology.animal
Quantitative Biology - Genomics
Gene
030304 developmental biology
Sequence (medicine)
Scaffolds
Genomics (q-bio.GN)
Whole genome sequencing
0303 health sciences
Genome assembly
Heterozygosity
biology
N50
Research
Vertebrate
De novo Assembly
Computer Science Applications
Fosmid
FOS: Biological sciences
Scalability
030217 neurology & neurosurgery
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 2047217X
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- GigaScience, GigaScience, 2013, 2 (1), pp.10. ⟨10.1186/2047-217X-2-10⟩, Bradnam, Keith R; Fass, Joseph N; Alexandrov, Anton; Baranay, Paul; Bechner, Michael; Birol, Inanç; et al.(2013). Assemblathon 2: evaluating de novo methods of genome assembly in three vertebrate species. GigaScience, 2(1), 10. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-217X-2-10. Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/96r138rs, GigaScience, BioMed Central, 2013, 2 (1), pp.10. ⟨10.1186/2047-217X-2-10⟩, Europe PubMed Central
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....bed770012eb3500d7b66d11edfc97ba9
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1186/2047-217X-2-10⟩