The efficacy and tolerability of cyclosporine G in human kidney transplant recipients

Twelve consecutive first cadaveric kidney transplant recipients received cyclosporine G (CsG)(initial dose 12 mg/kg per day) as basic immunosuppressive treatment along with prednisone (initial dose 0.5 mg/kg per day) for the first three months after transplantation. Thereafter CsG was replaced by Sandimmun (cyclosporine, CsA). Evaluation of the immunosuppressive efficacy and assessment of possible side effects of CsG was made and compared with the results in 38 historical control patients starting with the same dose of CsA as part of the same immunosuppressive dosage schedule. Statistically, there was no difference in patient survival at three (91% in CsG group versus 95% in CsA group) and twelve months (91% in CsG group versus 92% in CsA group), or in graft survival at three (75% in CsG group versus 89% in CsA group) and twelve months (75% in CsG group versus 84% in the CsA group). At equivalent oral doses of CsG and CsA significantly higher blood levels of CsG were observed (2P less than 0.05). Nephrotoxicity assessed by graft biopsy could be demonstrated to a similar extent in both groups, whereas hepatotoxicity was more pronounced during CsG treatment. Sequential measurements of bilirubin revealed a significant increase in all patients but median values were significantly higher in the CsG patients. A pronounced and concordant elevation of liver enzymes occurred during CsG treatment in three out of 12 patients. Liver biopsies performed in these patients revealed histological alterations consistent with toxic liver injury. Thus, in human kidney transplant recipients CsG and CsA appeared to be equally immunosuppressive and nephrotoxic but more hepatotoxic. On the basis of this limited experience we conclude that in human kidney transplant recipients CsG has no advantage over CsA.