Back to Search
Start Over
Effects of an Upper-Body Training Program Involving Resistance Exercise and High-Intensity Arm Cranking on Peak Handcycling Performance and Wheelchair Propulsion Efficiency in Able-Bodied Men
- Source :
- Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 34:2267-2275
- Publication Year :
- 2020
- Publisher :
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2020.
-
Abstract
- Chaikhot, D, Reed, K, Petroongrad, W, Athanasiou, F, van Kooten, D, and Hettinga, FJ. Effects of an upper-body training program involving resistance exercise and high-intensity arm cranking on peak handcycling performance and wheelchair propulsion efficiency in able-bodied men. J Strength Cond Res 34(8): 2267-2275, 2020-The aim of this study was to determine the training effects of an upper-body training program involving resistance exercise and high-intensity arm cranking on peak handcycling performance, propulsion efficiency, and biomechanical characteristics of wheelchair propulsion in able-bodied men. The training group (n = 10) received a 4-week upper-body resistance training (RT), 70% of 1 repetition maximum, 3 sets of 10 repetitions, 8 exercise stations, 2 times per week, combined with high-intensity interval training (HIIT) 2 times per week. High-intensity interval training consisted of arm-crank exercise, 7 intervals of 2 minutes at 80-90% of peak heart rate (HRpeak) with 2-minute active rest at 50-60% of HRpeak. The control group (n = 10) received no training. Both groups performed a preincremental and postincremental handcycling test until volitional exhaustion to evaluate fitness and a 4-minute submaximal wheelchair propulsion test at comfortable speed (CS), 125 and 145% of CS, to evaluate gross mechanical efficiency (GE), fraction of effective force (FEF), percentage of peak oxygen consumption (% V[Combining Dot Above]O2peak), and propulsion characteristics. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was performed (p < 0.05). Training resulted in a 28.2 ± 16.5% increase in peak power output, 13.3 ± 7.5% increase in V[Combining Dot Above]O2peak, 5.6 ± 0.9% increase in HRpeak, and 3.8 ± 1.5% decrease in HRrest. No training effects on FEF, GE, % V[Combining Dot Above]O2peak, and push characteristics were identified. In conclusion, the combined RT and arm-cranking HIIT improved fitness. However, it seems that this training did not result in improvements in propulsion efficiency and push characteristics. Additional wheelchair skill training may be needed to fully benefit from this advantage in daily life propulsion.
- Subjects :
- Adult
Male
medicine.medical_specialty
education
Arm cranking
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
High-Intensity Interval Training
030204 cardiovascular system & hematology
Wheelchair propulsion
Interval training
Young Adult
03 medical and health sciences
Oxygen Consumption
0302 clinical medicine
Wheelchair
Physical medicine and rehabilitation
Heart Rate
Heart rate
Humans
Medicine
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
business.industry
Upper body
Resistance training
Resistance Training
030229 sport sciences
General Medicine
C600
Biomechanical Phenomena
Wheelchairs
Arm
business
Training program
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 10648011
- Volume :
- 34
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....bf6c9463aeee53b26af11c537e65056a
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000002738