Back to Search Start Over

Hospital variation in use of prophylactic drains following hepatectomy

Authors :
Ryan P. Merkow
Mark E. Cohen
Brian C. Brajcich
Adam C. Yopp
Clifford Y. Ko
Karl Y. Bilimoria
Ryan J. Ellis
Michael I. D’Angelica
Source :
HPB (Oxford)
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic drainage following hepatectomy is frequently performed despite evidence that drainage is unnecessary. It is unknown to what extent drain use is influenced by hospital practice patterns. The objectives of this study were to identify factors associated with the use of prophylactic drains following hepatectomy and assess hospital variation in drain use. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of patients following hepatectomy without concomitant bowel resection or biliary reconstruction from the ACS NSQIP Hepatectomy Targeted Dataset. Factors associated with the use of prophylactic drains were identified using multivariable logistic regression and hospital-level variation in drain use was assessed. RESULTS: Analysis included 10,530 patients at 130 hospitals. Overall, 42.3% of patients had a prophylactic drain placed following hepatectomy. Patients were more likely to receive prophylactic drains if they were ≥65 years old (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.34, 95%CI: 1.16–1.56), underwent major hepatectomy (aOR: 1.42, 95%CI 1.15–1.74), or had an open resection (aOR 1.94, 95%CI 1.49–2.53). There was notable hospital variability in drain use (range: 0% to 100% of patients), and 77.5% of measured variation in drain placement was at the hospital level. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic drains are commonly placed in both major and minor hepatectomy. While some patient factors are associated with drain use, hospital-specific patterns appear to be a major driver and represent a target for improvement.

Details

ISSN :
1365182X
Volume :
22
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
HPB
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....c0a2c175124fa454e1ed34c2cbd7856d
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2020.02.006