Bismuth-containing quadruple therapy versus concomitant quadruple therapy as first-line treatment forHelicobacter Pyloriinfection in an area of high resistance to clarithromycin: A prospective, cross-sectional, comparative, open trial

Background Concomitant quadruple (CQT) or bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (BQT) is recommended as first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection depending on antibiotic resistance. Aim To compare the efficacy, safety, and compliance of CQT and BQT as first-line therapy for H. pylori eradication in real clinical practice in an area of high resistance to clarithromycin. Methods A prospective, open, comparative cross-sectional study including dyspeptic patients >18 years with H. pylori infection and with no previous eradication treatment was performed. CQT (omeprazole 20 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + amoxicillin 1 g + metronidazole 500 mg, all given twice daily, for 14 days) or BQT (omeprazole 20 mg twice daily + 3 capsules of Pylera® 4 times a day, for 10 days) was prescribed at the discretion of the prescribing physician. Eradication was tested by 13 C-urea breath test. Efficacy was assessed by intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses. Results One hundred and four consecutive patients were included (64.4% female, age 52.9 years). Fifty patients received CQT and 54 BQT. Eradication rate was similar with both therapies at the PP (CQT 97.9%, 95% CI: 93.9-100 vs BQT 96.2%, 95% CI: 90.9-100, P = 0.605) and ITT analyses (CQT 98.0%, 95% CI: 94-100 vs BQT 94.4%, 95% CI: 88.1-100, P = 0.346). The rate of adverse events was also similar with CQT (56%) and BQT (46.3%). One patient in each group discontinued the treatment due to significant adverse events. Conclusion The use of CQT and BQT as first-line treatment against H. pylori is similarly effective and safe strategy in an area of high clarithromycin resistance.