Back to Search Start Over

Screening practice and misplaced priorities

Authors :
Mauri, D.
Valachis, A.
Polyzos, N. P.
Cortinovis, I.
Karampoiki, V.
Loukidou, E.
Alevizaki, P.
Kamposioras, K.
Kouris, G.
Alexandropoulou, P.
Tsali, L.
Panou, C.
Stamatelopoulos, A.
Lakiotis, V.
Spiliopoulou, A.
Terzoudi, A.
Ioakimidou, A.
Karathanasi, I.
Bristianou, M.
Casazza, G.
Pavlidis, Nicholas
Pavlidis, Nicholas [0000-0002-2195-9961]
Surgical clinical sciences
Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy
Source :
Clinical and Translational Oncology
Publication Year :
2009
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2009.

Abstract

Purpose: To estimate cancer screening coverage among a large sample of Greek individuals. Methods: 7012 adults from 30 Hellenic areas were surveyed. Tests included: faecal occult blood test, sigmoidoscopy, chest X-ray, urine test, testicular examination, trans-rectal ultrasound, full blood count, skin examination, digital rectal examination, PSA, Pap test, mammography, clinical breast examination (CBE), self breast examination and breast ultrasound. Results: Eighty-eight percent of males and 93% of females declared being interested in cancer screening; 37.8% of men and 37.9% of women had had a medical consultation for screening purpose in the previous 2 years. Less than 2% reported having received screening for colorectal cancer or skin malignancies. Screening for cervical cancer, mammography and CBE was reported by 39.6%, 22.8% and 27.9% of females respectively. Twenty percent of males reported screening for prostate cancer. Conclusion: The actual opportunistic screening approach presents important deficiencies with displaced priorities in test performance and a low proportion of individuals undergoing recommended tests. © Feseo 2009. 11 4 228 236

Details

ISSN :
16993055 and 1699048X
Volume :
11
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Clinical and Translational Oncology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....c214a0ead3a91c54d0bd4f2290a205d7