Back to Search Start Over

OMERACT filter 2.1: Elaboration of the conceptual framework for outcome measurement in health intervention studies

Authors :
Peter Tugwell
Dorcas E. Beaton
Lee S. Simon
Clifton O. Bingham
Lara J Maxwell
George A. Wells
Maarten de Wit
Maria Antonietta D'Agostino
Philip G. Conaghan
Susan J. Bartlett
Laure Gossec
Beverley Shea
Maarten Boers
Jasvinder A. Singh
Vibeke Strand
Lyn March
Epidemiology and Data Science
Rheumatology
APH - Methodology
AII - Inflammatory diseases
Source :
Journal of Rheumatology, 46(8), 1021-1027. Journal of Rheumatology, Boers, M, Beaton, D E, Shea, B J, Maxwell, L J, Bartlett, S J, Bingham, C O, Conaghan, P G, D’Agostino, M A, de Wit, M P, Gossec, L, March, L, Simon, L S, Singh, J A, Strand, V, Wells, G A & Tugwell, P 2019, ' OMERACT filter 2.1: Elaboration of the conceptual framework for outcome measurement in health intervention studies ', Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 46, no. 8, pp. 1021-1027 . https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.181096
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Objective.The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Filter 2.0 framework was developed in 2014 to aid core outcome set development by describing the full universe of “measurable aspects of health conditions” from which core domains can be selected. This paper provides elaborations and updated concepts (OMERACT Filter 2.1).Methods.At OMERACT 2018, we discussed challenges in the framework application caused by unclear or ambiguous wording and terms and incompletely developed concepts.Results.The updated OMERACT Filter 2.1 framework makes benefits and harms explicit, clarifies concepts, and improves naming of various terms.Conclusion.We expect that the Filter 2.1 framework will improve the process of core set development.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0315162X
Volume :
46
Issue :
8
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Rheumatology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....c3014e46dea37be8caeffd842acb0cd0
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.181096