Back to Search Start Over

A Case-Matched Gender Comparison Transcriptomic Screen Identifies eIF4E and eIF5 as Potential Prognostic Markers in Male Breast Cancer

Authors :
Sami Shousha
Marcella Mottolese
Jo Dent
Carmine Carbone
Ian O. Ellis
Helene Thygesen
Alastair Droop
Vera Cappelletti
Davide Melisi
Lee B. Jordan
Valerie Speirs
Lucy F. Stead
Janina Kulka
Hedieh Honarpisheh
Rani Kanthan
Ingrid Hedenfalk
Maria Grazia Daidone
Rosemary A. Walker
Maria Litwiniuk
Sreekumar Sundara Rajan
Abeer M Shaaban
Cecilia Nilsson
Marie-Louise Fjällskog
L G Fulford
Margaret Jeffery
Anna Di Benedetto
Charlotte A. B Suleman
Gábor Cserni
Mark Stephens
J. Louise Jones
Matthew P. Humphries
Elena Provenzano
Source :
Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 23(10)
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Purpose: Breast cancer affects both genders, but is understudied in men. Although still rare, male breast cancer (MBC) is being diagnosed more frequently. Treatments are wholly informed by clinical studies conducted in women, based on assumptions that underlying biology is similar. Experimental Design: A transcriptomic investigation of male and female breast cancer was performed, confirming transcriptomic data in silico. Biomarkers were immunohistochemically assessed in 697 MBCs (n = 477, training; n = 220, validation set) and quantified in pre- and posttreatment samples from an MBC patient receiving everolimus and PI3K/mTOR inhibitor. Results: Gender-specific gene expression patterns were identified. eIF transcripts were upregulated in MBC. eIF4E and eIF5 were negatively prognostic for overall survival alone (log-rank P = 0.013; HR = 1.77, 1.12–2.8 and P = 0.035; HR = 1.68, 1.03–2.74, respectively), or when coexpressed (P = 0.01; HR = 2.66, 1.26–5.63), confirmed in the validation set. This remained upon multivariate Cox regression analysis [eIF4E P = 0.016; HR = 2.38 (1.18–4.8), eIF5 P = 0.022; HR = 2.55 (1.14–5.7); coexpression P = 0.001; HR = 7.04 (2.22–22.26)]. Marked reduction in eIF4E and eIF5 expression was seen post BEZ235/everolimus, with extended survival. Conclusions: Translational initiation pathway inhibition could be of clinical utility in MBC patients overexpressing eIF4E and eIF5. With mTOR inhibitors that target this pathway now in the clinic, these biomarkers may represent new targets for therapeutic intervention, although further independent validation is required. Clin Cancer Res; 23(10); 2575–83. ©2016 AACR.

Details

ISSN :
15573265
Volume :
23
Issue :
10
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....c489587ff72094ad8e11da106a35ca9a